reissue ?'s

Modern years of Rickenbacker Guitars from 1984 to the present

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

turner
New member
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:11 pm

reissue ?'s

Post by turner »

I have what I think is a great Idea..."cosmetic reissues". i.e. a 21 fret 330 with a "F" hole. It would cost the same as a standard (or would be 3 frets cheaper) :D This would give the guitar buying public more choice and add no extra cost to Rickenbacker and give us ric owners another reason to buy a new guitar.
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6955
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: reissue ?'s

Post by collin »

Dream on, pligrim. ;)
User avatar
scotty
Senior Member
Posts: 7095
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:27 am

Re: reissue ?'s

Post by scotty »

turner wrote: a 21 fret 330 with a "F" hole. It would cost the same as a standard
:lol: Good one.
turner
New member
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:11 pm

Re: reissue ?'s

Post by turner »

Really though why not? They already have everything. Selling more units makes far more than selling a few higher priced ones. They could do "full vintage spec" for the purists and charge more for those.
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6955
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: reissue ?'s

Post by collin »

I'm not the definitive answer here, but the costs involved with retooling and reprogramming CNC machines would be greater than the profits from increased sales due to the changes. We're not talking high volume here..

Changes cost money and the only way to cover those costs would be by raising the price significantly.... then you're in vintage reissue price levels, so what's the point?
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6955
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: reissue ?'s

Post by collin »

P.S.. Just buy yourself a 1997 reissue and there ya go. Guarantee it'll be cheaper than your fantasy Rick.
turner
New member
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:11 pm

Re: reissue ?'s

Post by turner »

Not my fantasy, I just thought it was a good idea to offer more choice to the public. Ric doesn't make any money off of used guitars. I've heard ( I could be wrong) the reason they don't do more vintage reissues is because of capacity/set up time etc... What I'm suggesting is kill 3 frets, or program the Cnc for an f instead of a slash, really nothing else.
turner
New member
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:11 pm

Re: reissue ?'s

Post by turner »

I must admit, I've never programmed a Cnc machine. I'm not a high volume builder and I'm certainly not in charge of ric. Just some fun food for thought. People build Cnc with a computer, router, printer components. It's not NASA
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: reissue ?'s

Post by aceonbass »

Jason, you don't just "kill 3 frets" to make a 21 fret guitar out of a 24 fret one. The neck and fretboard are different, and making those parts just for this guitar wouldn't be cost effective. I certainly wouldn't want less frets on any of my basses, so why do you want 3 less frets on your guitar? I get the F hole though.
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: reissue ?'s

Post by deaconblues »

aceonbass wrote:Jason, you don't just "kill 3 frets" to make a 21 fret guitar out of a 24 fret one. The neck and fretboard are different, and making those parts just for this guitar wouldn't be cost effective. I certainly wouldn't want less frets on any of my basses, so why do you want 3 less frets on your guitar? I get the F hole though.
IMO, on the Rickenbacker guitars 21 frets looks way better aesthetically than 24 frets. Especially on 3 pickup models.

Jason, the truth is that a lot of people would like to see the return of 21 fret guitars. But for the time being, it ain't gonna happen. That's it.
turner
New member
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:11 pm

Re: reissue ?'s

Post by turner »

I meant to post, 21 frets, and OR f hole. Just an f and nothing else would seem IMO easy. They already/still make 21fret necks. The 22,23,and 24th fret are almost superfluous on a 330 style guitar.
turner
New member
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:11 pm

Re: reissue ?'s

Post by turner »

If enough people want these things maybe they will listen to the public.
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: reissue ?'s

Post by kiramdear »

One can hope, but sadly that's all one can do. :( You can't argue with success.
All I wanna do is rock!
User avatar
k43rover
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:07 pm

Re: reissue ?'s

Post by k43rover »

turner wrote:If enough people want these things maybe they will listen to the public.

Welcome to the forum Jason!

There are plenty of people on here who would love to see f-hole/21 fret guitars return to the RIC product line up either as standard models or with those features as optional extra cost upgrades to standard models. However the factory have consistently maintained the position that it just won't happen. A couple of months back there was some speculation that we might see some accurate Rose Morris reissues next year (which would mark the 50th anniversary of the first exports to Rose Morris in England) but the factory subsequently denied there were any plans to do that. So, as Collin pointed out, your best bet is probably to seek out a nice used example of one of the Rose Morris reissues made a few years ago.
Attachments
Bring back the f.JPG
turner
New member
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:11 pm

Re: reissue ?'s

Post by turner »

I do want a rose Morris reissue! I even posted in the wanted section, I'm working on it :) but they could even put a f hole on a regular 24 fret guitar. Program the Cnc to cut every 5th guitar with a f hole (or something like that). Or a 21fret guitar with hi gains...something like that?? Just give more options even if its mostly cosmetic.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Modern Years - After 1983”