For years now I've been playing the "standard" ric set of strings, 10-42, but I'd just got to my local shop and buy strings individually, since I would replace the 10s with 9s and the 13s with 12s to make it easier to play...
So I decided to use the 10s and 13s and yeah, the chime is louder... so I go to the ric boutique... and now they are 10-46?
You can find quotes from ric online saying that 10-42 is the definite gauge, so...
what gives with the change?
does anyone notice a difference? like is the low end overwhelming the high?
The low e and a strings can go sharp with 42s when you fret them on low frets. Does using heavier low ends solve this?
strings for the 12 string...
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
-
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 723
- Joined: Thu Mar 14, 2002 8:57 pm
- Contact:
- kennyhowes
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 4959
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
- Contact:
Re: strings for the 12 string...
10-46 is where it's at, man.
Re: strings for the 12 string...
The older 10-42 string set may have had compressed wind lower strings instead of conventional round wrap lower strings. Compressing the windings, of course, makes the overall diameter of the string smaller. So they're about the same.
- kennyhowes
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 4959
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
- Contact:
Re: strings for the 12 string...
Sorry for the delayed proper response, John, bu t the answer is yes.johnashfield wrote:The low e and a strings can go sharp with 42s when you fret them on low frets. Does using heavier low ends solve this?
Re: strings for the 12 string...
What Kenny said. In addition, use a light touch, and have a qualified luthier make sure the nut slots are optimum.johnashfield wrote:The low e and a strings can go sharp with 42s when you fret them on low frets. Does using heavier low ends solve this?