My (Slightly) Modified 4003 - Powered By RickResource!

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
spongebob
Intermediate Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:32 am

My (Slightly) Modified 4003 - Powered By RickResource!

Post by spongebob »

I appreciate it may be a little sacrilegious to some Ric fans, but I've made a few mods to my 2013 4003, all through what I've read here on RR!

I've always kept my previous Rics stock, but for some reason with this one, thought I'd fix what I didn't like, or thought could be improved upon, for my own spec. So over the last 8 months....

First went the chrome pup cover, replaced by a Tube Ampology bezel.

Next went the bridge, replaced by a Hipshot.

Then it was the turn of the pickups. As recommended on here (and Chris' great review), I invested in a set of Classic Amplification 'Classic Ric', 70s era. These are amazing, and Brad is a top chap to deal with.

Lastly, it was the tuners. In came a set of Hipshot Ultralites, as mentioned by Cassius, again here on RR. Love these to bits....the weight saving is amazing. They're not a direct fit if you use the intended fixings, but as I'm not going back, my Luthier took care of all the fitting and drilling.

Again, I appreciate that it may not be to everyone's tastes, but it's my gigging bass, and it's my keeper, Took me a while to find it, and make a few changes, but I've never played a Ric, or any bass that plays and sounds like this one does now. Got a real Chris Squire/Jon Camp growl. :D

Here's a couple of pics -
Attachments
20140731_174413.jpg
20140731_174358.jpg
1974 (February) 4001 JG
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: My (Slightly) Modified 4003 - Powered By RickResource!

Post by jps »

You forgot to move the neck pickup to the 1/2" location and add a vintage style pickguard! :mrgreen:

I love Ultralite tuners and have had them on a lot of basses over the years, including my July '73 4001 and Deb '67 4005WB. Yes, they do require some minor mods but, so what. the purists of the world can just look away and not say anything............ These are our instruments to do what is necessary to make them how we want them to be for us as we are the ones playing them. I have done some form of mod to almost all of the basses I have owned over the years.

Enjoy your great looking 4003. 8)
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: My (Slightly) Modified 4003 - Powered By RickResource!

Post by woodyng »

Great looking bass,all those mods are going to make it a better player. I wouldn't mind trying a set of those tuning keys on one of my 4004's,but don't really feel the need to change the stock ones out.
Ps,every one of my Rick basses has been modded,sometimes extensively so to get what i want out of them,so thumbs-up!
User avatar
geofio
Member
Posts: 397
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 4:49 am
Contact:

Re: My (Slightly) Modified 4003 - Powered By RickResource!

Post by geofio »

Make your ric what you want it to be, personally i prefer mine stock.
User avatar
ram
Senior Member
Posts: 3743
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:55 pm

Re: My (Slightly) Modified 4003 - Powered By RickResource!

Post by ram »

Hey! It's your bass, do with it as you please. Some changes may affect resale, but as an original owner of a '74 4001MG (among others) I have never let that bother me. My 4001 has a push/pull bypass, Painted headstock wings (in 74 with black Testors model paint because it looked cool), Toaster in the neck pickup position and a Jason Lollar HS at the bridge position. 4003S5 has a stereo harness and jack. 4004L is now an 8 string and the 4004C is maybe going to get a new harness (still thinking on that one). Do what you want.... they are yours.
The only thing we can perceive are our perceptions - George Berkeley
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: My (Slightly) Modified 4003 - Powered By RickResource!

Post by cassius987 »

I would have gone with clovers/elephant ears on the Hipshots, but nevertheless those Y-keys look surprisingly nice on the Ric. Glad I could be of some help by suggesting those. Did you notice changes in the dead spots or resonance? I always do immediately after switching to the lighter tuners. I know I may get flamed for saying it but I wish Ric would switch to a lightweight clover key instead of the traditional tuner, except for the classic reissue-esque models.
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: My (Slightly) Modified 4003 - Powered By RickResource!

Post by teeder »

Looks great!
User avatar
geofio
Member
Posts: 397
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 4:49 am
Contact:

Re: My (Slightly) Modified 4003 - Powered By RickResource!

Post by geofio »

I would keep the original parts Iain, just on the chance that you need to move the bass on in the future. you never know.
User avatar
spongebob
Intermediate Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:32 am

Re: My (Slightly) Modified 4003 - Powered By RickResource!

Post by spongebob »

Thanks for the kind comments!

Cassius - you were a help indeed. I wasn't aware of the tuners until your postings about them. I've not had any problems with dead spots whatsoever. The luthier I use is fabulous, and when I got the bass back, it was great from the off.

I went for the Y style, simply to change the look ever so slightly. In the flesh, they're really nice.

A full +1 on Ric fitting lightweight tuners. The difference in the overall bass is amazing - I couldn't believe it. The bridge frees so much more of the playing position as well. I play this one so differently to my previous Rics.

As for the original bits, the bridge was sold some months ago, as was the pup cover. The pups and tuners are on their way too, as with the drilling for the tuners, I can't really go back! :mrgreen:
1974 (February) 4001 JG
User avatar
spongebob
Intermediate Member
Posts: 502
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:32 am

Re: My (Slightly) Modified 4003 - Powered By RickResource!

Post by spongebob »

jps wrote:You forgot to move the neck pickup to the 1/2" location 8)
Oh, I could be tempted further down the line! Would it make much of a difference?
1974 (February) 4001 JG
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: My (Slightly) Modified 4003 - Powered By RickResource!

Post by jps »

spongebob wrote:
jps wrote:You forgot to move the neck pickup to the 1/2" location 8)
Oh, I could be tempted further down the line! Would it make much of a difference?
I think so, and so do many others around here. One is aesthetics (we just like the '60s looks better), the other has to do with tone since the current location places that pickup right under a vibrational node of the strings, this is a point with minimal string movement, dampening the pickup of harmonics in that location.
Standing_wave.gif
The red dots are the nodes with minimal sound production.

Of course that will change depending on where you are fretting the string at any particular time, but it does change the tone a bit. Try this experiment: solo the bridge pickup and pluck the harmonics of the strings at the 24th fret position right above the neck pickup. The harmonics ring out very nicely. Now do the same while soloing the neck pickup. What do you hear (or not :wink: )? As I mentioned, things vary as you play up and down the fingerboard, but some of us do use harmonics in our playing style and this can negatively impact that unless the bridge pickup is favored.

On a related note :mrgreen: , put a toaster pickup in there, too. 8)
User avatar
RickyBubba
Intermediate Member
Posts: 657
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 11:58 am

Re: My (Slightly) Modified 4003 - Powered By RickResource!

Post by RickyBubba »

As others have said, have at it. You have done tasteful things, and it isn't a rare model. They are meant to be played, and if this makes you happier, Mo-better!
User avatar
iiipopes
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1479
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:02 pm

Re: My (Slightly) Modified 4003 - Powered By RickResource!

Post by iiipopes »

To see what difference it makes in tone between the 1 inch and the 1/2 inch position, tune the bass down a half-step, capo the 1st fret, and solo the neck pickup, playing your favorite bass lines, disregarding the slight floppiness from loosening the strings. You will be able to hear some of the "hollowness" that goes with the 1/2 inch spacing. It still won't be totally the same, because the high gains with the single pole piece per string have more articulation than a toaster, but you will get the idea.
User avatar
Kiddwad57
Intermediate Member
Posts: 738
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:59 pm

Re: My (Slightly) Modified 4003 - Powered By RickResource!

Post by Kiddwad57 »

Interesting comments about the harmonic nodes. How does the neck pickup on the current 4004 compare?
clankchris
Member
Posts: 279
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 6:43 pm

Re: My (Slightly) Modified 4003 - Powered By RickResource!

Post by clankchris »

Awesome looking bass!

I actually went looking for the Classic Amplification thread to see how you liked the pickups. Great :D
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”