A twelve saddle bridge as "Standard Equipment?"
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
A twelve saddle bridge as "Standard Equipment?"
I had tried to live with a six-string saddle on my Rickenbacker 12-string, but the leads I run on my low E and A strings made it impossible to be in tune with my band because the intonation was so bad on my guitar. Even giving into the "Slightly Out of Tune" fullness that the six-saddle bridge might give to some 12-strings, I went for the switch. Speaking just for me, having a 12-saddle bridge has made a world of difference in the intonation and the sound when playing lead.
My question is this, I can see Rickenbacker offering a twelve- saddle bridge from their catalogue for older model Rick 12's like mine, but why aren't twelve-saddle bridges offered as standard equipment on the new twelve string Rickenbackers?
My question is this, I can see Rickenbacker offering a twelve- saddle bridge from their catalogue for older model Rick 12's like mine, but why aren't twelve-saddle bridges offered as standard equipment on the new twelve string Rickenbackers?
Shut Up 'N' Play Yer Guitar!
Do a search - JH answered this question himself, probably numerous times.
The gist of the explanation was this:
1) If you use "high quality" machined strings, the saddle should theoretically intonate on all strings very well.
2) The materials used to make a "6-saddle" and a "12-saddle" are different, and the six-saddle version sounds better do to its physical properties. The drawback is you can't machine a "12-saddle" out of the same material for technical reasons.
I bypassed the whole issue and went for a 660/12.
The gist of the explanation was this:
1) If you use "high quality" machined strings, the saddle should theoretically intonate on all strings very well.
2) The materials used to make a "6-saddle" and a "12-saddle" are different, and the six-saddle version sounds better do to its physical properties. The drawback is you can't machine a "12-saddle" out of the same material for technical reasons.
I bypassed the whole issue and went for a 660/12.
"The only worthwhile conquests are those wrested from ignorance"
-Napoleon
-Napoleon
- tony_carey
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2055
- Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
I have had 3 Ric 12s...a 360, 450 & my present 12, a 330. All of them have had 6 saddle bridges & none of them had any intonation problems at all. I only know a couple of other people with 12s, another 360 & a 620 & they don't have problems either.
It could be Joey, that there are a few instruments that really need a 12 saddle bridge & you're just unlucky if you get such a guitar.
On the bright side though, it's easy to fix....just get a 12 saddle bridge.
It could be Joey, that there are a few instruments that really need a 12 saddle bridge & you're just unlucky if you get such a guitar.
On the bright side though, it's easy to fix....just get a 12 saddle bridge.
'Rickenbacker'...what a name! After all these years, it still thrills me.
The 12 saddle bride is standard equipment on the 660/12 models (and it was on the 660/12TP).
My experience has been that swapping out the six saddle for a twelve saddle on both of mine was goodness. It produced more noticeable results on my 360/12v64 than on my 370/12.
Quite a lot of great music was recorded with RIC twelve strings with six saddle bridges.
The argument that strings of different diameters will correctly intone while breaking over the same point doesn't make sense to me.
My experience has been that swapping out the six saddle for a twelve saddle on both of mine was goodness. It produced more noticeable results on my 360/12v64 than on my 370/12.
Quite a lot of great music was recorded with RIC twelve strings with six saddle bridges.
The argument that strings of different diameters will correctly intone while breaking over the same point doesn't make sense to me.
- loverickbass
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 5:00 am
-
- Member
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 7:49 pm
- Contact: