Archive through May 09, 2005 Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

The Rickenbacker Forum » Archives - Rickenbacker Guitars Jan - July 2005 » What do you think of this??? » Archive through May 09, 2005 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kevin Kuney (Krick)
Senior Member
Username: Krick

Post Number: 128
Registered: 05-2002
Posted From: 207.91.212.254
Posted on Sunday, May 08, 2005 - 11:25 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Look at the headstock! Opinions?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7321562077
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

paul wilczynski (Jingle_jangle)
Senior Member
Username: Jingle_jangle

Post Number: 1951
Registered: 12-2004
Posted From: 24.23.164.148
Posted on Sunday, May 08, 2005 - 11:48 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Wow. My first thought was "converted 6", but the headstock is about 3/4" longer than a 6. Nickel-plated tuning machines, interspersed with chrome plated banjo tuners points to a worker-built guitar, not necessarily a factory prototype.

Something hinky about the TRC, too...the lettering looks off but the pics are too tiny to tell.

"Factory doesn't want to talk about it" is an interesting embellishment.

Anyone else?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob Belloff (Belloff)
Senior Member
Username: Belloff

Post Number: 315
Registered: 02-2004
Posted From: 67.85.191.150
Posted on Monday, May 09, 2005 - 12:07 am:   Edit Post Print Post

What in the bloody hell?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Dean Mentjes (Dean712)
Senior Member
Username: Dean712

Post Number: 244
Registered: 01-2005
Posted From: 69.220.192.65
Posted on Monday, May 09, 2005 - 03:33 am:   Edit Post Print Post

Yikes!! Dicey...

Does it pass the sniff test? Would need more info. Dissing the Ric factory in the initial advertisement is a big stinkbomb.

Would you buy a used car here?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Graham Griffiths (8mileshigh)
Senior Member
Username: 8mileshigh

Post Number: 265
Registered: 11-2003
Posted From: 62.164.178.63
Posted on Monday, May 09, 2005 - 04:56 am:   Edit Post Print Post

It reminds me of the strange Richard Thompson Ricky......


I still don't think it's genuine.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

paul wilczynski (Jingle_jangle)
Senior Member
Username: Jingle_jangle

Post Number: 1960
Registered: 12-2004
Posted From: 24.23.164.148
Posted on Monday, May 09, 2005 - 05:00 am:   Edit Post Print Post

God, was Richard ever that young and smooth? And--who shot out the lights?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Williams (Jwilli)
Senior Member
Username: Jwilli

Post Number: 898
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 24.88.72.49
Posted on Monday, May 09, 2005 - 08:24 am:   Edit Post Print Post

I'd want clear closeup pics of the headstock, front and back. The heel is square. The answer awaits in the company logs. :-)
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Graham Griffiths (8mileshigh)
Senior Member
Username: 8mileshigh

Post Number: 267
Registered: 11-2003
Posted From: 82.163.138.230
Posted on Monday, May 09, 2005 - 11:43 am:   Edit Post Print Post

I'm not too sure about the ric o sound pic. Serial number looks odd? Stereo output? and the binding too white. Could be just the pic but I feel uneasy about this one.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Stan Castles (Buzfluhart)
Senior Member
Username: Buzfluhart

Post Number: 567
Registered: 06-2004
Posted From: 64.207.69.29
Posted on Monday, May 09, 2005 - 11:48 am:   Edit Post Print Post

According to the RIC site is was made in May '64
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

paul wilczynski (Jingle_jangle)
Senior Member
Username: Jingle_jangle

Post Number: 1962
Registered: 12-2004
Posted From: 63.193.9.8
Posted on Monday, May 09, 2005 - 12:18 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Or at least the jack plate was.