Archive through May 19, 2005 Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

The Rickenbacker Forum » Archives - Rickenbacker Guitars Jan - July 2005 » What do you think of this??? » Archive through May 19, 2005 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Williams (Jwilli)
Senior Member
Username: Jwilli

Post Number: 929
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 24.168.222.248
Posted on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 - 09:10 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

It was posted on VoxTalks.com earlier today.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Bob Belloff (Belloff)
Senior Member
Username: Belloff

Post Number: 349
Registered: 02-2004
Posted From: 67.85.191.150
Posted on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 - 10:38 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Kudos to Mr. Hall, who posted on VT that this guitar's invoice, dated 5/22/1964, describes it as a 360/12 string w/ banjo keys.

We would love to have/see some really high quality pics of this guitar. I know that!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anthony T. Blair (Tblair)
Senior Member
Username: Tblair

Post Number: 107
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 70.113.198.208
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 01:45 am:   Edit Post Print Post

It did end up selling after Ebay- so better pics may emerge.

Speaking of which, here are better pics of the headstock:

Click Me
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Karl Teten (Karl_teten)
Member
Username: Karl_teten

Post Number: 56
Registered: 04-2005
Posted From: 66.75.242.155
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 08:21 am:   Edit Post Print Post

From the 'click me' pics you can see the graft where the original headstock snapped off and the replacement was glued to.

The thick skunk center strip in the headstock stops right behind the nut.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Williams (Jwilli)
Senior Member
Username: Jwilli

Post Number: 931
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 24.168.222.248
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 08:36 am:   Edit Post Print Post

Karl, it does look like that according to those pics BUT its not the case. The guitar is original.....all of it. Hopefully, better pics will be posted soon.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Simmons (Leftybass)
Senior Member
Username: Leftybass

Post Number: 988
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 69.161.23.82
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 09:14 am:   Edit Post Print Post

JWilli is on the money. As weird as it looks, this 12-string is a bona-fide original.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

David McLaughlin (Combo850)
New member
Username: Combo850

Post Number: 7
Registered: 06-2003
Posted From: 68.232.66.122
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 10:04 am:   Edit Post Print Post

We should know for sure sometime this morning.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

David McLaughlin (Combo850)
New member
Username: Combo850

Post Number: 8
Registered: 06-2003
Posted From: 68.232.66.122
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 11:31 am:   Edit Post Print Post

I have now examined the guitar, and it is without a doubt...all-original, every last screw, all wiring, etc.. The guitar's most recent (and now former) owner was its second owner. Lefybass will be examining the guitar this afternoon, followed soon by Jwilli.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Patrick K. Kelly (Patrickkelly)
Member
Username: Patrickkelly

Post Number: 55
Registered: 03-2004
Posted From: 65.216.225.82
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 01:21 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Well I'll be dipped in sh!t. Sure fooled me.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

paul wilczynski (Jingle_jangle)
Senior Member
Username: Jingle_jangle

Post Number: 2091
Registered: 12-2004
Posted From: 63.193.9.8
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 01:44 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Dipped in what, Patrick?