Archive through May 19, 2005 Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

The Rickenbacker Forum » Archives - Rickenbacker Guitars Jan - July 2005 » What do you think of this??? » Archive through May 19, 2005 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Simmons (Leftybass)
Senior Member
Username: Leftybass

Post Number: 989
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 69.161.23.82
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 03:16 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Every now and then something comes along that is very uncommon and makes people scratch their heads, it doesn't look the lest bit 'normal'. Some people thought that about the little Tenor Guitar from 1961...that it was a modified Combo 950 with a shaved neck. Not so. Factory all the way.

The point is this: as unbelievable as some things appear, that doesn't mean it couldn't have been made that way, especially from those days...NO absolutes.

Someone just told me the other day about a 4080/12 that had a factory SHORT SCALE bass neck from a 3001, it matched the 12-string neck perfectly. How 'bout that for cool?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

paul wilczynski (Jingle_jangle)
Senior Member
Username: Jingle_jangle

Post Number: 2093
Registered: 12-2004
Posted From: 63.193.9.8
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 05:07 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

This is the best part of collecting such wonderful guitars--stocking up on the lore and pursuing the elusive.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Patrick K. Kelly (Patrickkelly)
Member
Username: Patrickkelly

Post Number: 56
Registered: 03-2004
Posted From: 65.216.225.82
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 06:09 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

I'll admit I was fooled. The banjo tuners really threw me. I mean, the Bantar didn't even have banjo tuners, fer cryin' out loud!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

David McLaughlin (Combo850)
New member
Username: Combo850

Post Number: 9
Registered: 06-2003
Posted From: 68.232.66.122
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 07:01 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

I'm sure the Grover friction banjo tuners were an attempt at keeping the peghead from being too long. They fit very neatly between the single-line Klusons. This peghead is really slender and cute, not as long or wide as the Gibson, Martin, and Fender 12-string pegheads. There are also screw holes where it originally had a trapeze tailpiece. Those holes appear to have been plugged and lacquered over at the factory.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Williams (Jwilli)
Senior Member
Username: Jwilli

Post Number: 934
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 24.168.222.248
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 09:26 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Here's some pics:
1997

12

4

7
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Simmons (Leftybass)
Senior Member
Username: Leftybass

Post Number: 990
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 68.232.67.156
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 10:04 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Well, I got my first look at the guitar.

David may be onto something about the tuners, for the guitar may have had to been made this way for it to fit in a standard-size Rickenbacker case. It does fit, but barely.

It is one of the coolest Rickenbackers to have ever been made at Electro-String, period. All the hallmarks of a custom-ordered instrument from the get-go. The 'R' tailpiece IMO has been on the guitar for MANY years, probably left the factory that way as David said. The only non-original parts I could see were the strap-peg (wooden!) on the upper horn, and the TRC screw at the tip of the name plate. Two long-pole toasters.

An odd combination of an O.S. deluxe 360 body(w/f-hole), R.O.S., and a unbound dot-inlay fretboard, and the crazy headstock with chrome(not nickel) Grover Banjo Tuners. The single-line Klusons are nickel, however.

The guts look untouched and there is plenty of wax residue/splatter in the control cavity.

Pretty wild, man. It may be the most oddball Rick 12 that's ever been made....I reckon we'll see a couple of pics soon...
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Williams (Jwilli)
Senior Member
Username: Jwilli

Post Number: 935
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 205.188.116.8
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 10:26 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Anyone care to take a guess about how much longer this guitar's headstock is compared to a regular '60s 12 string headstock? Bueller?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Hall (Johnhall)
Senior Member
Username: Johnhall

Post Number: 980
Registered: 01-2003
Posted From: 68.5.231.238
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 10:53 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Just after I posted the info on Voxtalks, I came over here to also post it and simply couldn't find this thread.

Sorry, I didn't mean to leave you guys out.

Indeed, we found the invoice and the description was correct, much to my surprise.

John, I'd say about 6 millimeters.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Williams (Jwilli)
Senior Member
Username: Jwilli

Post Number: 936
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 24.168.222.248
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 11:39 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Well, if thats equal to 1/4" then you the winner.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Patrick K. Kelly (Patrickkelly)
Member
Username: Patrickkelly

Post Number: 57
Registered: 03-2004
Posted From: 65.97.29.193
Posted on Thursday, May 19, 2005 - 11:50 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Wow. That guitar is pristine. Y'all done good.