Archive through May 27, 2005 Log Out | Topics | Search
Moderators | Register | Edit Profile

The Rickenbacker Forum » Archives - Rickenbacker Guitars Jan - July 2005 » 21 or 24 frets? » Archive through May 27, 2005 « Previous Next »

Author Message
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Noel Christian Riddell (Longhouse)
Senior Member
Username: Longhouse

Post Number: 259
Registered: 04-2003
Posted From: 68.217.134.174
Posted on Friday, May 06, 2005 - 11:19 am:   Edit Post Print Post

On a 21 fret Ric, isn't the neck pickup situated right where the 24th fret harmonic would exist? Thus making for an extra bit of chime and note bloom when played there...

Noel
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Steve Carsello (Steverok)
Intermediate Member
Username: Steverok

Post Number: 65
Registered: 03-2005
Posted From: 136.182.2.221
Posted on Friday, May 06, 2005 - 11:55 am:   Edit Post Print Post

Wow, I have a 24-fret with hi-gains and another with toasters, they have so much chime, I couldn't imagine much more. What I don't understand is how some people think that toasters work better with 21-fret necks. Then wouldn't hi-gains be better with 21-fret necks also ? Of course, "better" is relative and subjective, I am just trying to understand from people with more experience.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Peter McCormack (Admin)
Board Administrator
Username: Admin

Post Number: 3512
Registered: 04-2003
Posted From: 142.166.105.220
Posted on Friday, May 06, 2005 - 12:08 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Steve: This is such a subjective experience that it is hard to know how different the sound might be between these two configurations. As no two guitars are identical, regardless of the model number, a proper AB is not possible.

To my way of thinking, however, if you want to reproduce the sound of a certain era, then you need to have the same conditions in effect today as they did in yesterday. Is this possible, Not really but I consider you can get closer to the 60s sound with a 21 fret model and toasters than you can with a 24 fret and high gains for example.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anthony Carey (Tony_carey)
Senior Member
Username: Tony_carey

Post Number: 584
Registered: 10-2004
Posted From: 81.157.62.5
Posted on Friday, May 06, 2005 - 12:21 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Steve, the reason that toasters sound better in 21 fret necks IMO, is because toasters have slightly less bass response than the more powerful hi-gains. The positioning of the neck p/up being further down the body on a 21 fret neck helps to add a little more bottom end when using both p/ups together & balances the tone very nicely.
I have had 21 & 24 fret gtrs with toasters & the 21 fret has a lot more 'warmth' to it, but still retains the jangle.
I had a 1997 with hi-gains, but the hi-gain/21 fret neck was a little TOO warm (muddy) for my tastes!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Steve Carsello (Steverok)
Intermediate Member
Username: Steverok

Post Number: 66
Registered: 03-2005
Posted From: 136.182.2.221
Posted on Friday, May 06, 2005 - 12:24 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Thanks for that feedback. Not that this is a very rigorous A/B comparison, but I have a 330 with hi-gains, and a 360/12 with toasters. While both offer that distinct Rickenbacker chime we love, the tonal ranges are quite different, I would describe the toasters on a 24-fret as more crisp, with less bass, while the 330 with hi-gains seems a little smoother and creamier, fuller perhaps. It may be, however, that the toasters offer a more uniquely disctinct Rickenbacker sound. Who knows, I do believe that the toasters seem like a good match for a 12-string.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Steve Carsello (Steverok)
Intermediate Member
Username: Steverok

Post Number: 67
Registered: 03-2005
Posted From: 136.182.2.221
Posted on Friday, May 06, 2005 - 02:50 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Anthony, these are great points, again, I'll probably never know. Makes me wonder, however, why they don't put toasters on a 620 as the default configuration. If it's as you describe, the sound of a 620 with hi-gains might be muddy compared to a 330 or 360 with hi-gains.
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Anthony Carey (Tony_carey)
Senior Member
Username: Tony_carey

Post Number: 586
Registered: 10-2004
Posted From: 81.157.62.5
Posted on Friday, May 06, 2005 - 03:14 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Not the case Steve, as you are comparing a solid body with a hollow & you would expect the solid body to be a little 'harder' in sound!
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Steve Carsello (Steverok)
Intermediate Member
Username: Steverok

Post Number: 68
Registered: 03-2005
Posted From: 136.182.2.221
Posted on Friday, May 06, 2005 - 03:33 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Gotcha, I personally love the sound of my 360/12VP, I might agree that the tonal range is not as great as with the hi-gains, but for the sound it makes, it is great. I have never played a Ric solid body, I'd personally be very curious as to how a 360/12VP sounds, compared to a 660/12. That is comparing a semi-hollow 24-fret to a solid-body 21-fret, both with toasters. Kind of hard to write about sound, huh?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

Kent Fletcher (Brammy)
Senior Member
Username: Brammy

Post Number: 135
Registered: 04-2005
Posted From: 24.25.246.85
Posted on Friday, May 27, 2005 - 11:02 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

did Ric ever make a 21-fret 6-string 360?
Top of pagePrevious messageNext messageBottom of page Link to this message

John Williams (Jwilli)
Senior Member
Username: Jwilli

Post Number: 947
Registered: 04-2002
Posted From: 24.168.222.248
Posted on Friday, May 27, 2005 - 11:15 pm:   Edit Post Print Post

Sure, up to about 1970.