This 4001 S looks to need some serious TLC...

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
bigbajo60
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 912
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 8:15 pm

This 4001 S looks to need some serious TLC...

Post by bigbajo60 »

My first bass was a Rickenbacker...
My best bass is a Rickenbacker...
My last bass may very well be a Rickenbacker
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6263
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Post by cheyenne »

That is a "set neck" bass. Probably a model 4000 with the neck pickup added. Could have structural problems.
"Knowledge is Power"
ken_swearingen
Advanced Member
Posts: 2298
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 6:00 pm

Post by ken_swearingen »

Thats a tough call.
User avatar
atomic_punk
Senior Member
Posts: 5093
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by atomic_punk »

Looks like it was dipped in acid or something...that chrome looks NASTY! Dude, wipe it off once in a while...
"They make great f***'n basses". - Lemmy, NAMM 2009
User avatar
revolver323
Intermediate Member
Posts: 997
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:48 am
Contact:

Post by revolver323 »

Wonder what "violation" it was removed for originally?
User avatar
revolver323
Intermediate Member
Posts: 997
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:48 am
Contact:

Post by revolver323 »

Sorry -- comment above was not meant for this bass!
User avatar
bobcat
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 6:54 pm

Post by bobcat »

Technically, a 4001s IS a 4000 with a neck pickup added, albeit by the factory instead of by some guy with power tools and a soldering iron.
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

"Probably a model 4000 with the neck pickup added"

The TRC says MODEL 4001. Of course, it could be a replacement part.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6263
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Post by cheyenne »

Not a bad starting price though.
"Knowledge is Power"
kpj
New member
Posts: 26
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:06 pm

Post by kpj »

Weren't there set neck 4001's made in the late 70's? That is mentioned in the history of Rickenbacker bass models on this site.

1974 - Gap in center raised lip of bridge eliminated
(mid 70's) - Set neck design replaces neck thru design
1974 - Neck pickup was moved 1/2 inch closer toward the bridge pickup

http://www.rickresource.com/rrp/axtbassarticle2.html
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

Sorry, but a small correction is in order:
1973 - gap in center etc.;
1975 - neck p.u. moved etc..
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
ken_swearingen
Advanced Member
Posts: 2298
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 6:00 pm

Post by ken_swearingen »

Mr Silva is correct no gap after 73 and all 74s had 1/2 inch spacing.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”