Which Rick should I keep?

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

Aitch, you heard wrong. Must be da debbil trying again to talk you out of yours.

It's simple supply and demand...and with Iraq and Katrina, prices are way down.
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
simer4001
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 8:14 pm

Post by simer4001 »

I think we should set up a Forum Welfare System for just such an emergency.

Maybe you can get used braces. Its kind of gross, but heck, you don't have to wear them!
LET THE WORLD KNOW YOU WANT PAUL TO BRING BACK THE 4001. JOIN OUR FACEBOOK GROUP!! http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=147641915268984
User avatar
longhouse
Advanced Member
Posts: 2103
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 6:43 pm
Contact:

Post by longhouse »

Keep the 1997. It's the best Ric ever. Image They don't make them anymore and they stand out on stage and in the studio. Irreplaceable.
Shaking the floor of Heaven
User avatar
ozover50
RRF Consultant
Posts: 10492
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Contact:

Post by ozover50 »

Oh well...... my soul's probably only worth two bob anyway - I doubt that Beelzebub would be interested!!
"Never eat more than you can lift." - Mr. Moon
shamustwin
Senior Member
Posts: 5287
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:00 am

Post by shamustwin »

What years were the 1997 re-issues um...re-issued? Are there preferable years?
User avatar
krick
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2067
Joined: Sun May 06, 2001 2:09 pm
Contact:

Post by krick »

Mitch, I would keep the 1997 if I were you. You can always find another 330/12 or 620 but 1997 models were made in fewer numbers

Jerry, I believe the 1997 re-issues were only produced from 1987 through 2001.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Post by sloop_john_b »

Definitley keep the 1997!
User avatar
simer4001
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 8:14 pm

Post by simer4001 »

Howard, don't sell yourself short...Satan is always interested.
LET THE WORLD KNOW YOU WANT PAUL TO BRING BACK THE 4001. JOIN OUR FACEBOOK GROUP!! http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=147641915268984
randyz
Advanced Member
Posts: 1677
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 6:39 am

Post by randyz »

Jerry: As the proud owner of three 1997's ('89, '91, '99), I agree that the 1997 must stay. As far as differences between years, I've noticed minor changes in headstock shape, Fireglo shading, and F-hole size. My '89 has a very dark Fireglo and the '99 is very bright (but gorgeous). The '91 is a rare Jetglo. The F-hole opening on the '99 is much wider than the '89 and the '91. The headstock on the '99 is slightly longer than the '89 and the '91. They are all great players.
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Post by winston »

Mitch. You must be in a world of pain agonizing over this. Just so you know, I'm thinking of the impact to you in this scenario. This subject is a hard one. I know that it would upset me to have to divest myself of one of my Rics. Hopefully another path forward will be illuminated before you have to take this to fruition.
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
User avatar
ozover50
RRF Consultant
Posts: 10492
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Contact:

Post by ozover50 »

Brian: Who knows..... I may already be booked in at no cost!

Mitch: Assuming you have to go back to one Rick, the decision to be made is: "Do I want to keep a 12 or a 6?". If it's a 6, I'd keep the 1997. If it's back to 2, I'd keep the 330/12 and the 1997.
A 620 is going to be easier to find when you "follow the YellowRick road" again in the near future (I hope!).

I guess it also depends on how much money you need to raise......
"Never eat more than you can lift." - Mr. Moon
User avatar
octagon
Senior Member
Posts: 3798
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 7:19 pm

Post by octagon »

Thanks everybody for all the great advice and support.Howard, you put your finger on my most agonizing decision:do I want to keep my 1997 or my 330/12.The 1997 is beautiful it sounds wonderful and plays like a dream but my 12-string adds another dimension(the 5th?)to my Rickomania.Now I have another 6-string as I found an almost new Squire Affinity Strat w gigbag at a pawnshop yesterday for $39.This is just a cheap guitar but it suits most of my needs except my need for a Rickenbacker.So the bottom line is I will sell my 620 but I still can't decide between my other 2 Ricks.Oh agony,AGONY!
User avatar
ozover50
RRF Consultant
Posts: 10492
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Contact:

Post by ozover50 »

Pity the 620's not a lefty.... I'd take it off your hands in a flash!!
"Never eat more than you can lift." - Mr. Moon
User avatar
ozover50
RRF Consultant
Posts: 10492
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Contact:

Post by ozover50 »

Mitch: I have a possible 'stay of execution' in mind. It would involve me buying the 1997 (I've already got a 620). I'm planning on being in Minneapolis about this time next year (hint!!).

If you're interested, email me.......
"Never eat more than you can lift." - Mr. Moon
User avatar
melibreits
Senior Member
Posts: 4081
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by melibreits »

Mitch, keep the 1997, as the others will be easier to replace in the future....

Aitch, what are you going to be doing in Minneapolis? That's only about 4 hours away from my lovely little town, if you're a fast driver! Image
"Once I've held and played the best, baby, I won't settle for less!"
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”