Ric-O-Weight

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
rkbsound
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1205
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2002 3:48 pm
Contact:

Ric-O-Weight

Post by rkbsound »

I was playing a new 330 in a store the other day and noticed that it felt like it weighed less than my 1966 335. When I got home, I picked up my guitar and felt that it did seem heavier than the 330 in the store. I've never played any other 330 model before, so never had a chance to notice. Any big differences here? Reasons? Or is this just my imagination!?
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

It may depend on what type of internal bracing the guitar has...I have noticed on some Rickenbackers from 1966 to about 1969 that there is a little bit more than just X-bracing.

My theory on this is that many Ricks from that era were made with reinforced bracing to accomodate the converter-comb mechanism, if the factory decided to add this feature during assembly. This should be visible through the soundhole---visualize where the large chrome screw to hold the comb handle in place would be attatched to the top(just up and forward of the bridge p/up).....some Ricks in the mid-late '60's have this and some don't. My 1967 330/12 is heavier than others I have played(it has the added wood bracing), and my '68 370/12 has it as well. My 360/12CW is super-light compared to these older Ricks I have, but the bracing in the new guitars has changed a little, I think..

Don Adamek and I have talked of this before concerning our '68 12-strings---he no longer owns his, but it was 3 sn#'s away from mine, and was retrofitted with a Byrd wiring setup in Nov.1970 by Rickenbacker at the plant. Don's 360-370/12 had the added wood bracing.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”