Welcome Bob Belloff

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
greg_mitchell
Junior Member
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 7:17 pm
Contact:

Post by greg_mitchell »

"modern Rics rule..."

Right! None of that overblown, over priced overrated "vintage" stuff in here. No siree. Not here. Image
Actually, I'm partially serious in that as I think modern Rickenbackers are of a better quality than their predecessors.
I'd rather die while I'm livin' that live while I'm dead!
BobKat
Advanced Member
Posts: 1712
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:18 am

Post by BobKat »

There are definitely some things about newer Rickenbackers that lend more confidence than older ones. That takes nothing away from older ones, but the '80s did bring some great improvements in structural integrity and longevity. Did this come at the cost of tone? Some say yes but I think it's a blanket statement. Some new RICs sound better than some vintage pieces and vice-versa.
kcole4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3368
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:07 pm

Post by kcole4001 »

I think the whole "vintage" thing is part nostalgia for "the good old days" & part fact that quality isn't what it used to be when everything was hand made & pride of workmanship mattered more than gross sales figures.
This quality issue isn't relevant to Ricks since they're still made with the care & pride they always were, only now with more advanced equipment & materials.
The high prices for vintage Ricks are really for rare & discontinued pieces, not better made or finished pieces. But of course we all know that already.
Plus five minus five!
BobKat
Advanced Member
Posts: 1712
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:18 am

Post by BobKat »

Well said.
User avatar
greg_mitchell
Junior Member
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 7:17 pm
Contact:

Post by greg_mitchell »

I've yet to find a problem with mine....tonally or otherwise. I think in alot of situations it's what you're playing through, playing style, style of music, et cetera that makes the difference. I'm certainly happy with mine and if something were to happen to all of my guitars, my 4003 would be the first one I'd replace.
The reason for at least some of the "vintage" guitars not sounding as good ,in my humble opinion, is that some are bought, put away and not played, or not well cared for i.e. left out of their cases for extended periods, exposed to temp. extremes, and the like. I may be way off base here but I feel like that is possibly some of the examples of old guitars not sounding good.

However overall I feel that the newer Ricks have a much better build quality and the electronics are better than the older ones.
But that's my opinion.
I'd rather die while I'm livin' that live while I'm dead!
User avatar
greg_mitchell
Junior Member
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 7:17 pm
Contact:

Post by greg_mitchell »

Oh, by the way....welcome Bob...glad to have you!
I'd rather die while I'm livin' that live while I'm dead!
BobKat
Advanced Member
Posts: 1712
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:18 am

Post by BobKat »

Glad to have been asked to contribute.
User avatar
beatlefan
Senior Member
Posts: 4345
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 4:13 pm

Post by beatlefan »

Bob....

I haven't a "SHADOW" of a doubt that you're the right man for the job! Image
1973 4001 MG cb fwi
1986 4003 Shadow
2012 4004Cii FG w/gold trim
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6263
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Post by cheyenne »

Welcome Bob!
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

Welcome, now let's make Bob "sweat the details"!
User avatar
dannyboy
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2001 8:30 am

Post by dannyboy »

I'm sure you'll do a great job, Bob! Welcome Image
DannyBoy :)
Nowhere man please listen, you don't know what you're missing...
lawton
Member
Posts: 392
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 10:59 am
Contact:

Post by lawton »

Wow, Bob! Reading the blurb at the forum opener page makes me feel really good that you liked the setup on the 325C58 I sold you -- Geez... I didn't know that I was THAT good!

Image
User avatar
wayang
Senior Member
Posts: 3629
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 6:00 am

Post by wayang »

"Congratulations, Bob"...looking forward to lots of good info...
I didn't get where I am today by being on time...
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

old rics are over rated ... the old 4001 basses are yellowed, the pickups are weaker, they have a bass cut capacitor, when their truss rods are improperly adjusted the neck is damaged, and just putting on round wound strings stresses the 4001 beyond its design specs ...

Give me a modern Ric bass ... it is stronger, louder, fuller, more versatile, less rust, less yellowing, it is newer and better ... plus the modern basses can be converted to a 5 string bass ...
johnnyb
Junior Member
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 3:13 pm

Post by johnnyb »

After only three weeks with my new 4003fg..and having owned a 1982 4001 (in 1982!)..I would tend to agree that modern Ricks sound a great deal better than I remember my 4001 sounding..( yes I know..I just mean "bassier") I rather like the new neck...I love being able to roll off and into a very "precise" sound with that rick bite always present
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”