Ancestry of the 660 model

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
dean712
Intermediate Member
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:56 pm

Ancestry of the 660 model

Post by dean712 »

About a year ago, I bought a new 2004 660/12 which I absolutely love. It's a great guitar in every sense, and it has been a key element of my band's recording this weekend in the studio.

I also appreciate some of the vintage features (checkered binding, full-width fingerboard inlays, toaster pickups, etc.). I bought it based on comparisons with other available new 12-stringers. My apologies if this is an old topic, but I am learning more about Rickenbackers all the time from this forum, and I was wondering if someone could post a quick synopsis of the 660 model's history, evolution, etc. I really think it's one of the truly special and great guitars made today.
BobKat
Advanced Member
Posts: 1712
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:18 am

Post by BobKat »

The Rickenbacker 660/12 is really a continuation of a guitar that was designed as a Limited Edition. The 660/12 TP was introduced in 1991.

The 660/12 was based, no doubt, on Mike Campbell's 1963 625/12, which graces the cover of the "Damn The Torpedoes" album, released in 1979. That guitar, in and of itself, has an interesting history. Mike Campbell bought the 625/12 for $125 in 1974, completely unaware that it was the third Rickenbacker 12-string ever built, and the first solid-body. The serial number is CM 108, just one number away from George Harrison's 1963 360/12. It is reportedly one of only two 625/12's built in the '60s.

Back to the 660/12. When Rickenbacker and Petty were collaborating on Tom's signature model, they asked him what he would like on it. The number one feature was that he wanted a wider neck. So it was designed with a 1.75 inch width at the nut. I do not know if the other vintage features were decided upon by Tom or by Rickenbacker. In addition to the full-length triangle inlays, vintage tuners, tailpiece, knobs, guards, pickups, and truss rod cover, There is the decidedly non-vintage 12-saddle bridge, which continues on the 660/12, of course.

In any case, it was released to rave reviews in 1991, and the Limited Edition of 1000 was made through 1999. The LE was made only in Fireglo and Jetglo (mostly Fireglo; only 186 Jetglo were made).

When the Limited Edition ran out, Rickenbacker decided to keep making the guitar as the 660/12. They also introduced a 660 6-string, which was not part of the Tom Petty Limited Edition. All standard Rickenbacker colors are available. Have you ever seen a 660/12 Montezuma Brown? Beautiful!

I am sure that the availability of the 660/12 has held the line somewhat on the value of the 660/12TP; however, they do continue to appreciate, and are a valuable collectible RIC.

The neck profiles vary over the years. The TP had a slim neck profile, but the early 660 ("non-Pettys") had a fatter neck profile. They seem to have gone back to a slimmer profile in subsequent years. The Vintage pickups were revamped, along with all Rickenbacker Vintage pickups, in 1999, with a lower resistance figure (7.4K or so, as opposed to 11-13K) and vintage "scatterwinding", which replicates the old hand-guided winding machines of the '50s and '60s.

The charactered wood is also a great feature of the 660/12. Some of the TPs from the 1994-95 era have insane birdseye and these are my favorite.

Check out the Rickenbacker site for more info. They have a wealth of details on the 660/12TP, including the original press release, and final production totals.

You have a great guitar. Enjoy it and use it well.
User avatar
ozover50
RRF Consultant
Posts: 10492
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:07 pm
Contact:

Post by ozover50 »

Thanks, Bob...... makes me appreciate mine even more!! Image
"Never eat more than you can lift." - Mr. Moon
User avatar
bitzerguy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1678
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:22 am

Post by bitzerguy »

Ditto! Thanks Bob.

...Dean
...Dean
Never, ever drool on your surf shirt. It wrecks the solo.

660/12FG, 350V63/6FG, 620/6JG, 360WB/6DBG, Dingwall C1 #001, Prestige Heritage Elite FM
User avatar
dean712
Intermediate Member
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:56 pm

Post by dean712 »

Thanks, Bob. That's exactly what I was looking for! It is indeed a great guitar - very special and quite irreplaceable in my collection.
User avatar
marc61
Senior Member
Posts: 6443
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 9:31 am
Contact:

Post by marc61 »

Image

I just had to get this, and I don't play guitar. The 660 seems to be a beautiful guitar, and has terrific features for the money. If TP ever stops by for dinner, at least i have a guitar for him to jam on...
" It's not where you are, it's who you're with.".
fading_fast
New member
Posts: 23
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 7:33 pm

Post by fading_fast »

One thing I'd like to know is the ratio of 6 string versions to 12 strings produced.

It seems to me that 660/12s are far more common than the 6 string. I saw my MG 660/6 hanging in the store and reserved it right away. That was late Dec 2004. I haven't seen another since.
Master of the mighty G chord
BobKat
Advanced Member
Posts: 1712
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:18 am

Post by BobKat »

Rickenbacker's production totals are a cloely guarded secret so I can not answer this for you, but your observation dovetails with my own.
User avatar
dean712
Intermediate Member
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 8:56 pm

Post by dean712 »

A 660/6 will be my next guitar purchase, provided I can save up gig money and then find one!
beatcomber
Member
Posts: 222
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2004 6:00 am

Post by beatcomber »

"The neck profiles vary over the years. The TP had a slim neck profile, but the early 660 ("non-Pettys") had a fatter neck profile. They seem to have gone back to a slimmer profile in subsequent years."

Does this apply to the 6-string version as well?

I am seriously looking at placing an order for a 660/6, because I don't think that Rickenbacker (or anyone else) has ever made a more gorgeous instrument than a jetglo 660. One of the things I love most about Ricks is that narrow neck, and the supposedly wider neck of the 660 has been giving me second thoughts. Unfortunately, these guitars are just not available in stores to try before buying.

While on the subject, can anyone compare the tone of a 660 to a 300-series Rick with toasters? I've heard that they're similar, but with more of a Tele-like twang, which appeals to me.
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Post by jdogric12 »

That's right, Glenn, with the solid body and through-neck, it has a lot more sustain. Don't know about a Tele twang.

If you really love that narrow neck, be warned: you may not like adjusting to the wide neck. I prefer the smaller neck myself and sold a 660/12 shortly after buying it solely for that reason. I am much happier with my 330/12 and 360/12 necks. Perhaps consider a 620/12? Solid body, smaller neck. Of course, you miss out on the deluxe features, but life is a series of trade-offs, isn't it?
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Post by sloop_john_b »

The 660/12 spacing is comfortable for me, but the 300/12 series spacing would be as well. That said, i'll take the deluxe features of my 660/12!

The only issue I have with it is neck-dive. But it's not that bad.
User avatar
marc61
Senior Member
Posts: 6443
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 9:31 am
Contact:

Post by marc61 »

IMHO those getting the 660 75th anniversary edition, will be in for a treat.
" It's not where you are, it's who you're with.".
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

That is why I opted for the 660 AV guitar! Image
j_gary
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1465
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 12:47 pm

Post by j_gary »

I'm thinking the 660AV might be the sleeper of the four models. The AV package combined with the deluxe features should make her quite a looker.

Can't wait to see one.
I'm just happy to be here.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”