TWO NEWBIES

Exceptional restoration is in the details

Moderator: jingle_jangle

User avatar
jwilli
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4327
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2000 8:45 pm

Post by jwilli »

Paul wrote "I would describe these as very rudimentary guitars, compared with the Gibsons and Fenders of the era..."

Yes, but thats the charm of these Combo 400s. You'll want one after its put back together and set up. :-)
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

Sorry for the double post.

It seems to me the Gibson Melody Makers and Les Paul Jrs. are about as basic a guitar as it gets.
This is off the record
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

The assembly and finish of the Gibsons (and Fenders) was of a better standard than Ricks back in '57. A year later, Rickenbacker really began to get their act together.
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

I see.
This is off the record
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

This is off the record
User avatar
sowhat
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5380
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2003 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by sowhat »

Nice!
Nothing will get you dead quicker than being deadly serious about yourself.
squid
Member
Posts: 463
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 8:54 am

Post by squid »

Wow. I actually like that more than a 660/12. That simple strip of binding really sets the colour off.
randyz
Advanced Member
Posts: 1677
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 6:39 am

Post by randyz »

John: I agree completely. I think the checkerboard binding is too much sometimes. I definitely prefer the look of Glenn's guitar to the 660/12 or the TP signature model. Paul did a fantastic job on that finish!
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by jingle_jangle »

So, Randy, then you're not a fan of 381s?
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
randyz
Advanced Member
Posts: 1677
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 6:39 am

Post by randyz »

Paul: As a matter of fact, I'm not. I don't have anything against them, but I prefer the more common 1960's models (i.e. 325, 330, 360, 450, 610). The 381's are beautifully constructed but they are too fancy for my tastes.
User avatar
studiotwosession
Advanced Member
Posts: 2215
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:36 pm

Post by studiotwosession »

I'm in the minority, being a fan of the thinner neck widths.

But I think it's kind of funny how the Petty model and 660s have wider necks, which Petty is said to favor (after all, he chose it for his model) yet on his recent tours he's also out there playing 425s.
This is off the record
Post Reply

Return to “Reflections of a Curmudgeon: by Paul Wilczynski”