A project to send your way?
Moderator: jingle_jangle
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Eminently restorable, provided the carbon fiber pieces can be removed! I'd write the seller and ask if they're loose or can be taken out easily.
Also note: the tuning peg holes will need bushing. Not a big deal; just though I'd mention it. I don't think the tailpiece is correct, either. Our historians-in-residence can weigh in on this stuff.
Also note: the tuning peg holes will need bushing. Not a big deal; just though I'd mention it. I don't think the tailpiece is correct, either. Our historians-in-residence can weigh in on this stuff.
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
― Kurt Vonnegut
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Bass experts, please help out on this one. I'm out of my element.
Ted, Paul, John S., anyone else?
Ted, Paul, John S., anyone else?
“I say in speeches that a plausible mission of artists is to make people appreciate being alive at least a little bit. I am then asked if I know of any artists who pulled that off. I reply, 'The Beatles did.”
― Kurt Vonnegut
― Kurt Vonnegut
What's wrong with the tailpiece?
There's a bit of flame showing in the wood, so it must be what: 1974 or 1975 at the latest? Later ones (mine included) have plain wood. Pots are supposedly from '74, so that's the earliest.
I'd ask for more shots of the neck & back of headstock to check for breaks, possibility of having had Grovers originally.
There's a bit of flame showing in the wood, so it must be what: 1974 or 1975 at the latest? Later ones (mine included) have plain wood. Pots are supposedly from '74, so that's the earliest.
I'd ask for more shots of the neck & back of headstock to check for breaks, possibility of having had Grovers originally.
Plus five minus five!
- sloop_john_b
- Rick-a-holic
- Posts: 13843
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am
-
dale_fortune
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 6:00 am
You may be opening a can of worms on this one. The graphite bars are replacing the T-rods, how are they put in: glued or pressure fitted? Bridge is not original(5 screws holes) but will work fine. Needs a lot of parts and work. IMO you'd be better off buying a complete one that hasn't been modified. This thing is up to $400.00 and the reserve hasn't been hit yet. I bet they are wanting $500.00 to $600.00. Figure on around $200.00 for a correct pickup and tuners, then around $800.00 labor for frets/fingerboard/peg head/refinish/T-rods are hard to find,(I make them) and shipping and you are around 2 grand for a $1,200.00 instrument.
Paul: I'll echo that it's a set-neck 4000, spring/summer 1974 production, Burgundyglo. Hopefully the jackplate is original, I see it's pictured with the remaining hardware.
Looks like it has had the same tuner mod that my '72 had before you fixed it during the resto. I don't know how high I'd go at this point, I suppose that's up to the bidders...
If it could be had for a decent price, then the added investment for a proper restoration would make it worthwhile. Curmudge, you probably have idea on what it would take to get it back to spec....
Looks like it has had the same tuner mod that my '72 had before you fixed it during the resto. I don't know how high I'd go at this point, I suppose that's up to the bidders...
If it could be had for a decent price, then the added investment for a proper restoration would make it worthwhile. Curmudge, you probably have idea on what it would take to get it back to spec....
