4003S? 4001V63? Some of both?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

BobKat
Advanced Member
Posts: 1712
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:18 am

Post by BobKat »

http://cgi.ebay.com/vintage-1984-rickenbacker-bass-4003-S-clean-rare-mojo_W0QQitemZ140076351582QQihZ004QQcategoryZ4713QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

Check it out. Truss rod adjustment at the body, 4003s heastock, BUT: Vintage P/U surround, toaster, vintage front pickup spacing, vintage guard/knobs. No split tailpiece.

Very interesting bass.
BobKat
Advanced Member
Posts: 1712
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 9:18 am

Post by BobKat »

And round heel, 20th fret dot.
User avatar
incubus2432
Senior Member
Posts: 4174
Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2004 11:26 am

Post by incubus2432 »

19th fret dot. Image
User avatar
byu
Intermediate Member
Posts: 651
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 4:53 pm
Contact:

Post by byu »

Definitely a 4003S that's been V63'd.
User avatar
bobcat
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 6:54 pm

Post by bobcat »

Whatever it is, it's gorgeous!
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

It is stereo and it has a maple stripe.
kcole4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3368
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 7:07 pm

Post by kcole4001 »

Seven screw tailpiece and originally had the two-piece pickguard.

Someone better grab it! It's too nice to let it slip by.
Plus five minus five!
User avatar
s4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3514
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by s4001 »

I need to go to the doctor. I've got a serious case of RAS.
"If you think you can or if you think you cannot - either way you are right." Henry Ford.
dluxe
Junior Member
Posts: 139
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 7:24 pm
Contact:

Post by dluxe »

The channel route looks wrong. Shouldn't it have the drill marks?
User avatar
charlyg
Senior Member
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2005 2:01 am

Post by charlyg »

I was wondering the same thing?
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12652
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

4003S? 4001V63? Some of both?

Post by doctorwho »

I think that you're right, the channel should look like this:

Image

Note how the routing in the pickup area differs, too.
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

No, they started making smooth routes in about 1980. My '80 AG has no forstner-cut channels like that.
User avatar
bob_atherton
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1441
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:47 am

Post by bob_atherton »

It has a vibe a bit like my V63 prototype bass that is shown in the Smith book as a V63, but isn't. Mine did have an early magnetic shoe and plexi TRC. Both 1984.
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

In the neck pickup route you can clearly see where the "shoulders" have been removed, to accomodate a ½" pickup location. This bass originally had its front pickup at 1" from the neck.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
john_l
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2001 12:55 pm

Post by john_l »

Bob, does your v83 prototype have truss rods that adjust at the body?
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”