
4001V63 vs 4001C64
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
-
jwr2
Marketing is what it's all about when you are selling a product!
I love it when people here state that the later CS basses are just a V63 of a diffent color (and that may be).
But what are the Autumn glows and the Sea greens? The silver with WT and Jet glow BTs? Azure and the early white ones? Ruby reds and Deep Burgandy glow? The DCM!
Horses of a different color for sure.
Non-standard Ricks continue to demonstrate the value of limited production offerings, be they 75 or 1000 in number. RIC seems to have a knack for picking the production level that falls on the correct side of the demand every time!
YMMV.
I love it when people here state that the later CS basses are just a V63 of a diffent color (and that may be).
But what are the Autumn glows and the Sea greens? The silver with WT and Jet glow BTs? Azure and the early white ones? Ruby reds and Deep Burgandy glow? The DCM!
Horses of a different color for sure.
Non-standard Ricks continue to demonstrate the value of limited production offerings, be they 75 or 1000 in number. RIC seems to have a knack for picking the production level that falls on the correct side of the demand every time!
YMMV.
I have both a V63 and a C64. They are both fantastic basses. BTW, I stated in a earlier post elsewhere on the forum that I might be selling my 4003MB. Big suprise....I've changed my mind. It's such a great instrument that I can't bring myself to part with it. My Jazz Bass and my OLP/MM SR basses are another story though.
I recently went back to playing a Rickenbacker bass. Its like meeting an old friend again
I have played both and the differences are minor IMHO, both very well made instruments, what else can you expect? I just can't get used to the upside-down headstock. You can always change pickups and bypass the cap and even re-shape the neck, and in effect turn a V63 into a C64 and vice versa, but there's nothing you can do about that headstock. IMHO that's why V63's are in bigger demand than C64's, or at least that's the impression I get following eBay listings.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Yes, its doable, but how much do you want to spend on a bass? I think buying a C64, flipping the headstock, and refinishing it would be more expensive than buying a case queen V63.
I like the reverse headstock on a C64S. Its supposed to be Macca's bass as it is today. Macca's bass has an upside-down headstock, therefore it is a fairly accurate representation of his bass. But I think the regular C64 should be offered with either right-side-up or upside-down headstocks.
I like the reverse headstock on a C64S. Its supposed to be Macca's bass as it is today. Macca's bass has an upside-down headstock, therefore it is a fairly accurate representation of his bass. But I think the regular C64 should be offered with either right-side-up or upside-down headstocks.
Play what you love, love what you play!
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
