4001V63 vs 4001C64

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12652
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Post by doctorwho »

Jared, shouldn't that be "a dam-dam-dam world"? Image
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

both the V63 and C64 are excellent examples of marketing ... basically they are an "S" bass ... the "S" basses were a cheaper 4001/4003 model that cost less to make and sold for less ... but now they are considered rare and sell for more than the deluxe models with binding and triangle inlays ...
relayer4u
Intermediate Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 3:54 pm

Post by relayer4u »

Marketing is what it's all about when you are selling a product!

I love it when people here state that the later CS basses are just a V63 of a diffent color (and that may be).

But what are the Autumn glows and the Sea greens? The silver with WT and Jet glow BTs? Azure and the early white ones? Ruby reds and Deep Burgandy glow? The DCM!

Horses of a different color for sure.

Non-standard Ricks continue to demonstrate the value of limited production offerings, be they 75 or 1000 in number. RIC seems to have a knack for picking the production level that falls on the correct side of the demand every time!

YMMV.
User avatar
jnbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5359
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2001 7:58 am

Post by jnbass »

"Jared, shouldn't that be "a dam-dam-dam world"? :
)..."

Damn!
Buy it before someone else does
rickfan63
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 8:30 am

Post by rickfan63 »

I have both a V63 and a C64. They are both fantastic basses. BTW, I stated in a earlier post elsewhere on the forum that I might be selling my 4003MB. Big suprise....I've changed my mind. It's such a great instrument that I can't bring myself to part with it. My Jazz Bass and my OLP/MM SR basses are another story though.
I recently went back to playing a Rickenbacker bass. Its like meeting an old friend again
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

I have played both and the differences are minor IMHO, both very well made instruments, what else can you expect? I just can't get used to the upside-down headstock. You can always change pickups and bypass the cap and even re-shape the neck, and in effect turn a V63 into a C64 and vice versa, but there's nothing you can do about that headstock. IMHO that's why V63's are in bigger demand than C64's, or at least that's the impression I get following eBay listings.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
rickfan63
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 8:30 am

Post by rickfan63 »

I like the reverse headstock myself. It sets the bass apart from my other two Ricks, and attracts more attention to itself.
I recently went back to playing a Rickenbacker bass. Its like meeting an old friend again
alansan
New member
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 4:25 am

Post by alansan »

I agree. I find the V63s way over priced, but because I don't favour the reversed C64 headstock they are my only option when buying a vintage reissue Ric bass.
User avatar
bobcat
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1319
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 6:54 pm

Post by bobcat »

+1 on the reversed headstock . . . I know it's a purely aesthetic difference, but for some reason it matters quite a bit to me. More so than even whether the bridge pickup is a hi-gain or a horseshoe.
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

Do you think Paul or Dale can flip a reverse headstock? It should be doable.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

Yes, its doable, but how much do you want to spend on a bass? I think buying a C64, flipping the headstock, and refinishing it would be more expensive than buying a case queen V63.

I like the reverse headstock on a C64S. Its supposed to be Macca's bass as it is today. Macca's bass has an upside-down headstock, therefore it is a fairly accurate representation of his bass. But I think the regular C64 should be offered with either right-side-up or upside-down headstocks.
Play what you love, love what you play!
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Post by teeder »

I agree.
There Is What You Can See. There Aren’t What You Don’t See. And That’s All There Is That You Get!
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

"Its supposed to be Macca's bass as it is today"

I was under the impression that today his bass has a hi-gain.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Post by rickaddict »

It did have a hi-gain all through the 70's, but I'm not sure how the bass looks today. I've heard rumors that it has a re-issue horseshoe now, but I wouldn't know as the poor guy seems hung up on sacrificing quality for weight these days!
Play what you love, love what you play!
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Post by teeder »

Yeah, look what that got him for a wife!

Oh, Happy Days, My FG V63 arrived today! I forgot how nice the coloring is on her!
There Is What You Can See. There Aren’t What You Don’t See. And That’s All There Is That You Get!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”