4000 Basses

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
ricosound
Intermediate Member
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 11:36 am

Post by ricosound »

All of our upper horns seemed thinner back when!
No matter where you go - there you are.
basshawk
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 382
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2002 9:10 pm

Post by basshawk »

I'll have to get some shots loaded up of my '68 4000. There are a few pictures of it here
www.radiosurfers.net
Is everybody ready?
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12652
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Post by doctorwho »

Here's my 1977 4000FL BG next to my 4001 Ruby:

Image
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

The cream 4000 was a Marc Seligman special to make it look like a 4001CS.
User avatar
gareth
Intermediate Member
Posts: 655
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 8:55 am
Contact:

Post by gareth »

Here you go, my '84 Azureglo with RIC horseshoeImage
User avatar
mgauction
Advanced Member
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by mgauction »

That is pretty, Gareth! I'm a big AG fan!
Leprosy is rare & scarce but nobody wants that!
joebassman
New member
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:57 am
Contact:

Post by joebassman »

Are these smaller scale than the 4003s? Just curious.
Joe
basshawk
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 382
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2002 9:10 pm

Post by basshawk »

Same scale, Joe. The necks are a little thinner because they have no binding. They were all neck-through until around 1972 when they went to set necks.
Is everybody ready?
joebassman
New member
Posts: 53
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 5:57 am
Contact:

Post by joebassman »

Cool thanks for the info. Is it less loud with just the one pick up?
basshawk
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 382
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2002 9:10 pm

Post by basshawk »

I have a re-issue horseshoe in mine and it is every bit as loud as my 4003. The tonal range may be somewhat limited compared to a 4001 or 4003, but I don't feel that I'm missing anything. I get plenty of bottom out of it.
Is everybody ready?
User avatar
gareth
Intermediate Member
Posts: 655
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 8:55 am
Contact:

Post by gareth »

This may be sacriledge, but I'm considering bumping her up to a 4001S. The routing is there, and I've got most of the parts, including a 4001 TRC. I'll keep all the original parts though to convert back in the future.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Post by johnallg »

It's your bass. I would leave the 4000 electronics intact, but with totally dual filled guards, it would be a quick solder job to switch between a 4000 and a 4001s.
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Post by ken_j »

My '68 seemed to have low output when it was new. It did have a horseshoe pickup. I couldn't tell you if the 4000s came with the bass cut cap back then. Here is another pic. This one really shows the different fretboard wood coloring.
Image
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Post by johnallg »

According to the RIC schematic, the 4000 did not use the series cap. Used the 250k volume and 500k tone pots.

http://www.rickenbacker.com/pdfs/19522.pdf
User avatar
bob_atherton
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1441
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 4:47 am

Post by bob_atherton »

Sergio made me a very evil PUP for mine. It's my favorite RIC (-:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”