YGBSM! A grand for a bad shell?
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Re: YGBSM! A grand for a bad shell?
The sad part is the destruction of a complete bass to part it out in the hopes that the pieces are worth more than the whole thing. I think he's in for a hard lesson.
"Practice does not make perfect. Only perfect practice makes perfect." Vince Lombardi
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: YGBSM! A grand for a bad shell?
Just taking the pi$$ out of his listing, Andrew...wints wrote:Paul...
Your computer keyboard OK?
Re: YGBSM! A grand for a bad shell?
Doh!
Long morning...

Long morning...
Re: YGBSM! A grand for a bad shell?
I think the seller should sell this one to Jon Camp.
Re: YGBSM! A grand for a bad shell?
[post rendered redundant by faster typists ...]
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
-
gray
Re: YGBSM! A grand for a bad shell?
There was a bass for sale around these parts for a while that looked juuuust like that one...
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: YGBSM! A grand for a bad shell?
Oh, so it was a "parts" bass, too, Robert? 
Re: YGBSM! A grand for a bad shell?
I hate to ask, but for what is "YGBSM" an acronym?

- bassduke49
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6580
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am
Re: YGBSM! A grand for a bad shell?
Daniel, go back one page for 'splanation.
Re: YGBSM! A grand for a bad shell?
When did 4001 basses have the 7 screw tailpiece? I'll bet this is an early 4003 that he put a 4001 TRC on.
Re: YGBSM! A grand for a bad shell?
All I see is 5 holesjohnallg wrote:When did 4001 basses have the 7 screw tailpiece? I'll bet this is an early 4003 that he put a 4001 TRC on.
-
gray
Re: YGBSM! A grand for a bad shell?
Well, yes and no. Same year, Same neck break (only a darker line along the seam of the break), same color, same checking, even on the fretboard. Missing mute, missing mute screw. I'm not saying that this is the same one, but it is remarkably similar, and it was listed online for a time, so it IS possible. It played and sounded great actually, it just looked, well, funky. All it needed was a couple new parts and a refin, really. It's a shame either way, when it could have been simple, but oh well.jingle_jangle wrote:Oh, so it was a "parts" bass, too, Robert?
Considering all the miracles imparted upon us by yourself and Dale, I have a hard time looking at any vintage instrument as a parts bass, with the exception of Jerry Only's 4001.
Re: YGBSM! A grand for a bad shell?
Looked like 7 to me when I looked at the auction.ben_brown wrote:All I see is 5 holesjohnallg wrote:When did 4001 basses have the 7 screw tailpiece? I'll bet this is an early 4003 that he put a 4001 TRC on.![]()
- bassduke49
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6580
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am
Re: YGBSM! A grand for a bad shell?
Now he's got the neck pickup, black pickguard, and controls up for $500. Dreamer.
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: YGBSM! A grand for a bad shell?
gray wrote:Well, yes and no. Same year, Same neck break (only a darker line along the seam of the break), same color, same checking, even on the fretboard. Missing mute, missing mute screw. I'm not saying that this is the same one, but it is remarkably similar, and it was listed online for a time, so it IS possible. It played and sounded great actually, it just looked, well, funky. All it needed was a couple new parts and a refin, really. It's a shame either way, when it could have been simple, but oh well.jingle_jangle wrote:Oh, so it was a "parts" bass, too, Robert?
Considering all the miracles imparted upon us by yourself and Dale, I have a hard time looking at any vintage instrument as a parts bass, with the exception of Jerry Only's 4001.
My comment was a riff on your words, "for sale around these parts".
