s5 question.
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Re: s5 question.
Wow, this sure is a wordy thread! Question answered, though.
- leftyguitars
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2818
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 1:44 am
- Contact:
Re: s5 question.
Yes, yes & yes. (very JG, FG & MG)
- leftyguitars
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2818
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 1:44 am
- Contact:
Re: s5 question.
Did somebody call?show off!
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: s5 question.
Do all of our tuners have to have the flat side to the camera when posing for a photo, Peter?

- leftyguitars
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2818
- Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 1:44 am
- Contact:
Re: s5 question.
That was an experiment. It does look **** though I'll admit. 
This looks better...
This looks better...
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: s5 question.
Ahhhhhhhh, that's better!

-
jwr2
Re: s5 question.
The 4003s5 is pretty much the same as a 4003s. The neck is about 1/8" or 1/16" bigger. The bridge pickup is overwond to 15k ohms as opposed to the normal 11k ohms. The neck pickup is a toaster. The headwings are different shaped. The tailpiece is a modified 4003 tailpiece. The bridge is a different part that has 5 saddles. And the tuners used are Schaller m4.
Basically it is the original 4-2-5 Rickenbacker bass.
Basically it is the original 4-2-5 Rickenbacker bass.
-
jwr2
Re: s5 question.
The 4003 has 2 11k ohm pickups, 1 less hole in the headstock, vintage tuners, 4 saddles on the bridge, and the normal headstock wings ... 
