1997 vs 1998 PT

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Fiendish Thingy
New member
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 3:42 am

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by Fiendish Thingy »

Are there any significant differences between the neck of a 90's era 1997 and 90's era 330's/360's (inlays aside)? I mean shape, feel...
1998 360/12v64 FG
1983 350 JG
2001 4001v63 FG
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6992
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by collin »

Fiendish Thingy wrote:Are there any significant differences between the neck of a 90's era 1997 and 90's era 330's/360's (inlays aside)? I mean shape, feel...

From all the different ones I've played, yes. The 1997 necks varied big time, but I have played maybe a half dozen of them, and even more modern 330's and the modern necks are much fatter. I wish I had actual size measurements, but I don't.

Even 1997 reissues vary- early ones had slimmer necks compared to later reissues, but then you could have two necks made the same day that feel entirely different. It's one of the benefits of a handmade instrument, they all have their own feel.
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by deaconblues »

I played a friend's 1997RI of unknown vintage a few years back and it felt just like my '93 330. The 330 has a very slim, comfortable neck, which I hear is typical of that era. I tend to like thicker necks now, but I had a fat-neck '05 360/12 that was downright painful to play after long sessions for some reason - just carved really uncomfortably.
shamustwin
Senior Member
Posts: 5287
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:00 am

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by shamustwin »

My 1987 has a very fine, slim neck.
Don't know about the middle one it's about the same as the '87, IIRC.
'00 has a thick neck comparatively, and it's my favorite for playing live and recording.
Don't personally know about 330 necks, thought I'd guess the thicker necked 1997's are close to them.
User avatar
AQuickOne
New member
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:06 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by AQuickOne »

OK Folks...Jake....you might want to jump on this....less than $2000.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ... SS:US:1123
Just posted today.
You are KAOS, I am CONTROL!
'98 FG 1997SPC/VB
User avatar
AQuickOne
New member
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:06 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by AQuickOne »

You are KAOS, I am CONTROL!
'98 FG 1997SPC/VB
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by JakeK »

Thanks for the heads up, Jeff. A number have actually told me about this in the "Ric Marketplace" forum. I'm hoping I can bid on this...a PT signature is out of the question now. I don't want it, or need it. Pete himself didn't even have the windmill pose pickguard, why should I? I also don't need a SPC, if I really wanted that third pickup, I could get a second 1997 and have one of the RIC luthiers add one for me (or remove the neck, make a new neck and add binding to make a custom 1993/12, but that's another story). I had trouble with the third pickup when I owned a 325, pick kept hitting the middle pickup, so two pickups are better than three. If I don't/can't get this, I can always check with Mike Parks...or Gbase...or any other sources I dare to look.
User avatar
AQuickOne
New member
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:06 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by AQuickOne »

Just looking out for your best "interests" Jake. Good luck.
You are KAOS, I am CONTROL!
'98 FG 1997SPC/VB
shamustwin
Senior Member
Posts: 5287
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:00 am

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by shamustwin »

It is pretty...
User avatar
jch
Intermediate Member
Posts: 851
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 10:23 am

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by jch »

That is a very nice looking one 8)
I hope someone here gets it.
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by JakeK »

I hope *I* can get it. :|
User avatar
AQuickOne
New member
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:06 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by AQuickOne »

Jake,
By *I* , I can assume you are the current hight bidder?
You are KAOS, I am CONTROL!
'98 FG 1997SPC/VB
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by JakeK »

Nah, I like to wait 'til the last two minutes of the auction before I place a bid. That's when the action's fun :D
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6992
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by collin »

JakeK wrote:Nah, I like to wait 'til the last two minutes of the auction before I place a bid. That's when the action's fun :D

Two minutes? Pffft.....that's why you get outbid!

My rule is 20 seconds or less. If you can't count the seconds on two hands....fuggetaboutit.

I remember getting frustrated at snipers years ago, until I learned that everyone knows how the game works, and ya might as well get good at it if you want something. Of course, computer sniper programs have made it harder..
User avatar
AQuickOne
New member
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:06 pm

Re: 1997 vs 1998 PT

Post by AQuickOne »

It's over $2100 now. I am glad to see that these are finally appreciating in value.
You are KAOS, I am CONTROL!
'98 FG 1997SPC/VB
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”