The Paul McCartney sound

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10932
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: The Paul McCartney sound

Post by cjj »

jon wrote:
rickenbrother wrote: Carefully wrap the exposed ends of a piece of insulted wire around both ends of the .0047 cap.
How do we insult the wire? :)
Let me play guitar through it???
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37509
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: The Paul McCartney sound

Post by jps »

Where've you been Vincent? Are you back from Brasil?
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: The Paul McCartney sound

Post by kiramdear »

I think Paul only used the neck pickup on his 4001. It even went a long time with the horseshoe non-functioning before the bass was repaired at the factory.
All I wanna do is rock!
User avatar
dog
Intermediate Member
Posts: 540
Joined: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:46 pm
Contact:

Re: The Paul McCartney sound

Post by dog »

rudi_remme wrote:
dog wrote:
rudi_remme wrote:I will try out those TI flats. Thanks!

Anyone know which strings he actually used? More specific than long shiny ones.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
I hope that was meant as a joke. I know it cracked ME up!
Which part is cracking you up? Either way I'm a joke... ;)
Naw. It was the part about being more specific than long shiny ones! :D
Never use money as a means to measure wealth
vincent_gallo
Member
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 1:54 am

Re: The Paul McCartney sound

Post by vincent_gallo »

Yes i am back. From Argentina.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: The Paul McCartney sound

Post by johnallg »

I am pretty sure Paul played Rickenbacker flats as JH has posted over on the RIC forum about Paul's bass tech and his search for all the old RIC flat sets he could get. Also, Paul used a LOT of compression. I always thought he only used the neck pickup but these pictures of the Revolver sessions disprove that. Also looks like the neck is low and the treble pup up all the way???
Paul & FireGlo Ric - Revolver.jpg
Paul and RIC in studio.jpg
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37509
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: The Paul McCartney sound

Post by jps »

vincent_gallo wrote:Yes i am back. From Argentina.
Welcome back! How did the filming go?
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: The Paul McCartney sound

Post by sloop_john_b »

John, some here believe that the wiring harness was flipped, hence down = neck pickup.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: The Paul McCartney sound

Post by johnallg »

sloop_john_b wrote:John, some here believe that the wiring harness was flipped, hence down = neck pickup.
Ahh, yes, I remember now - a righty harness on a lefty guard. That re-aligns the universe for me... :lol: I had always heard it was all neck and cut treble and lots of compression.
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: The Paul McCartney sound

Post by teeder »

I agree with that theory. I do believe there are a few tunes with the horseshoe being used though. Glass Onion comes to mind. I hear that rear pu clanking through the mix.
At least that's what it sounds like to me. Sounds great, IMO!
User avatar
iamthebassman
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2415
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: The Paul McCartney sound

Post by iamthebassman »

teeder wrote:I agree with that theory. I do believe there are a few tunes with the horseshoe being used though. Glass Onion comes to mind. I hear that rear pu clanking through the mix.
At least that's what it sounds like to me. Sounds great, IMO!
Hmm..I always thought Glass Onion was Fender Jazz Bass, at least that's what I play when we do that tune, perhaps I'm wrong.
User avatar
tennis_nick
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1476
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 9:56 am

Re: The Paul McCartney sound

Post by tennis_nick »

teeder wrote:I agree with that theory. I do believe there are a few tunes with the horseshoe being used though. Glass Onion comes to mind. I hear that rear pu clanking through the mix.
At least that's what it sounds like to me. Sounds great, IMO!
I've got a feeling that all those "clanky" tunes are in fact, the jazz bass.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: The Paul McCartney sound

Post by sloop_john_b »

tennis_nick wrote:I've got a feeling that all those "clanky" tunes are in fact, the jazz bass.
They are commonly thought of as the Jazz, but the sound has always reminded me more of an uncapped horseshoe.
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: The Paul McCartney sound

Post by teeder »

sloop_john_b wrote:
tennis_nick wrote:I've got a feeling that all those "clanky" tunes are in fact, the jazz bass.
They are commonly thought of as the Jazz, but the sound has always reminded me more of an uncapped horseshoe.
My thoughts exactly. I easily get closer to that sound with the 4001S with the two pu's combined (either with or without the cap) than I do with the JB. And my JB is on the bright side.
User avatar
basmansam
Member
Posts: 387
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 12:58 pm

Re: The Paul McCartney sound

Post by basmansam »

sloop_john_b wrote:
tennis_nick wrote:I've got a feeling that all those "clanky" tunes are in fact, the jazz bass.
They are commonly thought of as the Jazz, but the sound has always reminded me more of an uncapped horseshoe.
I think the "clanky" tunes are actually a Fender Bass VI.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”