Tonal differences - 2 or 3 pups on 300-series Rics

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
argonaut05
New member
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 9:36 pm

Tonal differences - 2 or 3 pups on 300-series Rics

Post by argonaut05 »

Hello, all, new to the forum.

Three years back I purchased a 360/12 and put a 12-string saddle (duh) and scatterwounds on it. I worked with it for about a year but never got comfy with the skinny neck. In late '07 I took the 660/12 plunge (BBR - I've seen some nice flames on 660/12 BBRs here, but I wouldn't trade mine for any of 'em). I then traded the 360/12 for a 360/6 in amberglo and put the scatterwounds on that.

For quite a while, I thought that my luthier (a great guy whom I have no other reasons to mistrust at all) had tampered with the scatterwounds. I like to play heavily overdriven as much as I do clean, and I found little difference in terms of playing overdriven chords on the neck pups between the 360 with the toasters and my Heritage 555 (their superior "knockoff" of an ES-335) with SD-'59s, and, quite honestly, the series of Les Pauls I used to own. As a reference point, I would cite the nasty post-Chuck Berry chordal sound Keith Richards used on "Miss Amanda Jones." Puketrescent mud city! And very surprising with the Ric. I actually have no problem with this for lead lines - it's a great sound, and certainly distinctive with the Ric as opposed to the humbucker guitars - but no versatility, as striking a second string on any of those instruments at those settings is tonal catastrophe. Anyway, I tried the same amp setting and plugged in the 660/12. Same stuff. It's not the toasters, it's the neck pup as a phenom in general. I expected more tonal clarity out of single coils - I haven't had such negative experiences with Fender guitars.

So, my basic question is - how would it affect the tonality of the bass switch settings if I replaced my 360 with a 340 or 370 with scatters? Would it tend to clean up the muddiness to have the middle and neck mixed? I have owned and played several guitars, but never a bass/treble pup setup with three pups (as opposed to the 5-way switching of a Strat). I want to act on this fairly quickly (if I'm going to) due to the dinosauring of the 3-pup option.
Janglyman
Junior Member
Posts: 186
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:51 pm

Re: Tonal differences - 2 or 3 pups on 300-series Rics

Post by Janglyman »

I have noticed the same thing on my Ricks (mid 60's 450-12 and '88 360-12). The neck p/u always sounds muddy and dark relative to the other 2. The neck p/u just doesn't jangle. Since I 've got it on 2 guitars built years apart, I just assumed this was normal for Ricks. The 450 has toasters and the 360 has hi-gains.

I've tried the Ric-o-sound input, but it makes no diff. Same with adding a compressor. Amp settings don't make any difference either.

Let's talk further.

Janglyman
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Tonal differences - 2 or 3 pups on 300-series Rics

Post by JakeK »

The neck pickup-toaster or hi-gain-just doesn't sound that good when I'm rocking out, weither it be Who, Stones, Petty, Kinks, Beatles, whatever- but it does sound nice and jazzy if you blend the blend knob just right.
argonaut05
New member
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 9:36 pm

Re: Tonal differences - 2 or 3 pups on 300-series Rics

Post by argonaut05 »

Thanks, Jake, I'll toy with the blend knob a bit more on my 360 and see what difference that makes.

Thanks also for your input, Janglyman. You know, I actually like the neck pickup used clean - not necessarily by itself (although that's what McGuinn did with his 12-string on the RCA sessions of "Eight Miles High" and "Why" to get that dark sound), but the bridge is too tinny without a bit of the neck heft. I do tend to roll up the tone on the neck when playing clean, though.
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Tonal differences - 2 or 3 pups on 300-series Rics

Post by JakeK »

You can enhance the bridge pickups tone with the right amount of compression.
User avatar
antipodean
Senior Member
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:27 am

Re: Tonal differences - 2 or 3 pups on 300-series Rics

Post by antipodean »

JakeK wrote:The neck pickup-toaster or hi-gain-just doesn't sound that good when I'm rocking out, weither it be Who, Stones, Petty, Kinks, Beatles, whatever- but it does sound nice and jazzy if you blend the blend knob just right.
Great tip Jake! That blend knob, once you learn how to use it, is one of the great Ric features!
"I don't want to sound incredulous but I can't believe it" Rex Mossop
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Tonal differences - 2 or 3 pups on 300-series Rics

Post by jdogric12 »

I agree with the suggestions regarding the 5th knob. Also try toying with the two volume knobs.

Lastly, what amp are you using? Have you tried messing with those settings? That makes a huge difference for me. I usually do a typicall scoop setting: Low around 7, Mid around 4, High on 10.
User avatar
ted_williams
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2001 12:58 pm

Re: Tonal differences - 2 or 3 pups on 300-series Rics

Post by ted_williams »

The middle pickup on a 370, with standard wiring, makes the "up" switch position usable as far as I'm concerned. It adds more mid-range than you can get by balancing in the bridge pickup with the fifth knob. Go here: http://www.myspace.com/tinfoilhelmetmusic, and listen to the opening chords of "The Best Is Yet To Come" for a demonstration. 370WB with toasters.
User avatar
britinvasion
Member
Posts: 298
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 12:03 am

Re: Tonal differences - 2 or 3 pups on 300-series Rics

Post by britinvasion »

ted_williams wrote:The middle pickup on a 370, with standard wiring, makes the "up" switch position usable as far as I'm concerned. It adds more mid-range than you can get by balancing in the bridge pickup with the fifth knob. Go here: http://www.myspace.com/tinfoilhelmetmusic, and listen to the opening chords of "The Best Is Yet To Come" for a demonstration. 370WB with toasters.
I have found this to be true with my 370FG. I traded my 360MID in for it , for this very reason. But for some reason I have no problem with the way my 360/12 neck pick-up sounds on it own, it just didn't cut it on the 6 string .
User avatar
8mileshigher
Senior Member
Posts: 4886
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:34 pm

Re: Tonal differences - 2 or 3 pups on 300-series Rics

Post by 8mileshigher »

Maybe J-Dog could re-post that link, with his little Bach music sampler he did a year or so ago, where he tested three different Ricks with an assortment of either three PUPs, High Gains or Toasters. It was an interesting comparison of the sound of three different Rics, all playing the same tune through the same compressor, amp, set up, etc. I seem to recall they were all 12 string models....

J-Dog is that recording still in your archives vault ?

Rich F.
still
New member
Posts: 65
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 12:51 am

Re: Tonal differences - 2 or 3 pups on 300-series Rics

Post by still »

argonaut05 wrote:I like to play heavily overdriven as much as I do clean...
So, my basic question is - how would it affect the tonality of the bass switch settings if I replaced my 360 with a 340 or 370 with scatters? Would it tend to clean up the muddiness to have the middle and neck mixed?
It might help.

What you're hearing when you play is the total package -- guitar; effect boxes; amp. I find Rics to be very fidgety and very surprising, depending what I plug them into, and how the I twiddle the knobs.

I have convinced myself many times that the Ric neck setting (i.e., switch up) is useless. That applies equally to both the 2- and 3-pickup models. Then I plug into a different amp, or turn a knob on the distortion box, and the sound comes alive. Those "muddy pickups" weren't muddy after all...

That happens to some extent with other guitars (Strats, for example), but never the way it does with Rics. I find it hard to get a REALLY good sound on a Ric -- lots of trial and error -- but totally worth the effort. When the elements come together (the right guitar, the right distortion, the right amp), you get something unique, and uniquely satisfying.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”