RIC Bass Pickup Comparison

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10932
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

RIC Bass Pickup Comparison

Post by cjj »

So, has anyone ever done a comparison of the various RIC bass pickups, impedance, single/humbucking, sound, etc. for all the various ones that have come out? We've got the Horseshoe, the toaster, the hi-gain for bridge and neck, the HB1 humbucker, the 4002 pickups. I'm sure I've missed something in there.

In particular, at the moment, I'm interested in the differences between the 4002 pickups and the HB1, both in normal and single coil mode. And then a comparison to the 4001/4003 types might be nice too.

I'm kind of wondering what a 4004 withe HB1's with the 4002 tone circuit might be like...
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
Lost Coyotes
Intermediate Member
Posts: 900
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison

Post by Lost Coyotes »

I may have missed discussion about this, but I'm also curious about the differences within the hi-gain versions, other than cosmetic. Button top, adjustable pole, the original non-adjustable with screw buttons vs. later with no screw type heads, and the ones that have the raised flat part along the long edges, etc.
"Why didn't I just learn how to cook"
RobRick
Member
Posts: 325
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:14 pm

Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison

Post by RobRick »

Anyone know what PU is in my 1974 Rick 4000 bass? It is stock, that's all I know.
loves4003
New member
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:23 am

Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison

Post by loves4003 »

Hope these links work:

Highgain

Toaster

These are samples I made using my '94 4003FG with the original highgain and my '04 4003BB with a toaster. Both samples use only the neck pu. All other noises come from fooling around with AbletonLive. BTW, this is not music... :wink:
User avatar
paul_yan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2119
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 2:09 pm
Contact:

Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison

Post by paul_yan »

Rob, yours is the first generation "Hi-Gain" treble pickup.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison

Post by rickaddict »

loves4003 wrote:Hope these links work:

Highgain

Toaster

These are samples I made using my '94 4003FG with the original highgain and my '04 4003BB with a toaster. Both samples use only the neck pu. All other noises come from fooling around with AbletonLive. BTW, this is not music... :wink:
I haven't been able to listen to these clips 'cuz I'm at work, but I see another factor here that makes this not a direct comparison. In '94, a 4003 would have had 250Kohm tone pots, whereas an '04 4003 would have had 330Kohm tone pots. All else equal, the '04 should sound brighter.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison

Post by johnallg »

paul_yan wrote:Rob, yours is the first generation "Hi-Gain" treble pickup.
Yeah, the 8k ohm best sounding one. :wink:
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison

Post by johnallg »

rickaddict wrote:
loves4003 wrote:Hope these links work:

Highgain

Toaster

These are samples I made using my '94 4003FG with the original highgain and my '04 4003BB with a toaster. Both samples use only the neck pu. All other noises come from fooling around with AbletonLive. BTW, this is not music... :wink:
I haven't been able to listen to these clips 'cuz I'm at work, but I see another factor here that makes this not a direct comparison. In '94, a 4003 would have had 250Kohm tone pots, whereas an '04 4003 would have had 330Kohm tone pots. All else equal, the '04 should sound brighter.
And it does. The only TRUE way to do these pickup sound comparisons would be the same bass, same circuitry. But then if you used a 4001/3 the HB1 would be at a disadvantage because of the pot values. I don't know what the answer is. But I would think it entails using the same physical bass.
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison

Post by cassius987 »

I do think those clips are fairly illustrative, though, of the OVERALL differences. The Toaster is obviously fatter and the Hi-Gain has more grind. This is exactly what I experienced in them move from Hi-Gains to Toasters before. For that particular clip I thought the Hi-Gain fit much better.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison

Post by johnallg »

My experience with the current higains is they are more aggressive but less distinct sounding, whereas putting in a current toaster refines with more note delineation but very similar tonal characteristics, just not as aggressive sounding. With the higain I had trouble from open E to G# hearing the exact note. My experience.
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison

Post by cassius987 »

I feel like the low E issue also comes from string choice, though (and of course the relief and action). If I throw TIs on ANY of my Rics the E string opens up a hundred fold.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”