RIC Bass Pickup Comparison
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
RIC Bass Pickup Comparison
So, has anyone ever done a comparison of the various RIC bass pickups, impedance, single/humbucking, sound, etc. for all the various ones that have come out? We've got the Horseshoe, the toaster, the hi-gain for bridge and neck, the HB1 humbucker, the 4002 pickups. I'm sure I've missed something in there.
In particular, at the moment, I'm interested in the differences between the 4002 pickups and the HB1, both in normal and single coil mode. And then a comparison to the 4001/4003 types might be nice too.
I'm kind of wondering what a 4004 withe HB1's with the 4002 tone circuit might be like...
In particular, at the moment, I'm interested in the differences between the 4002 pickups and the HB1, both in normal and single coil mode. And then a comparison to the 4001/4003 types might be nice too.
I'm kind of wondering what a 4004 withe HB1's with the 4002 tone circuit might be like...
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
- Lost Coyotes
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 900
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison
I may have missed discussion about this, but I'm also curious about the differences within the hi-gain versions, other than cosmetic. Button top, adjustable pole, the original non-adjustable with screw buttons vs. later with no screw type heads, and the ones that have the raised flat part along the long edges, etc.
"Why didn't I just learn how to cook"
Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison
Anyone know what PU is in my 1974 Rick 4000 bass? It is stock, that's all I know.
Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison
Rob, yours is the first generation "Hi-Gain" treble pickup.
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison
I haven't been able to listen to these clips 'cuz I'm at work, but I see another factor here that makes this not a direct comparison. In '94, a 4003 would have had 250Kohm tone pots, whereas an '04 4003 would have had 330Kohm tone pots. All else equal, the '04 should sound brighter.
Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison
Yeah, the 8k ohm best sounding one.paul_yan wrote:Rob, yours is the first generation "Hi-Gain" treble pickup.
Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison
And it does. The only TRUE way to do these pickup sound comparisons would be the same bass, same circuitry. But then if you used a 4001/3 the HB1 would be at a disadvantage because of the pot values. I don't know what the answer is. But I would think it entails using the same physical bass.rickaddict wrote:I haven't been able to listen to these clips 'cuz I'm at work, but I see another factor here that makes this not a direct comparison. In '94, a 4003 would have had 250Kohm tone pots, whereas an '04 4003 would have had 330Kohm tone pots. All else equal, the '04 should sound brighter.
- cassius987
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4723
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison
I do think those clips are fairly illustrative, though, of the OVERALL differences. The Toaster is obviously fatter and the Hi-Gain has more grind. This is exactly what I experienced in them move from Hi-Gains to Toasters before. For that particular clip I thought the Hi-Gain fit much better.
Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison
My experience with the current higains is they are more aggressive but less distinct sounding, whereas putting in a current toaster refines with more note delineation but very similar tonal characteristics, just not as aggressive sounding. With the higain I had trouble from open E to G# hearing the exact note. My experience.
- cassius987
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4723
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: RIC Bass Pickup Comparison
I feel like the low E issue also comes from string choice, though (and of course the relief and action). If I throw TIs on ANY of my Rics the E string opens up a hundred fold.
