Take care, Joey!
1978 Rickenbacker 4008 8 String
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: 1978 Rickenbacker 4008 8 String
Is that the tracking device you were telling me about that the aliens installed after you were abducted and..."probed?"
Take care, Joey!

Take care, Joey!
Re: 1978 Rickenbacker 4008 8 String
Kudos Joey, Hope all is well.
- rickenbrother
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 13201
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am
Re: 1978 Rickenbacker 4008 8 String
Thanks for the kind words, guys. It was an intense scare. I'm glad that's all it turned out to be.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! 
Re: 1978 Rickenbacker 4008 8 String
Glad you're okay.
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: 1978 Rickenbacker 4008 8 String
So what did RIC say?aeternum wrote: I have contacted Rickenbacker again just now.... I'll let ya know what they say when I hear back..
- FretlessOnly
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 1605
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:00 pm
Re: 1978 Rickenbacker 4008 8 String
It's on ebay now as an 8 string Rick; no mention of "4008" in the listing.
Can we have everything louder than everything else?
- hieronymous
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:46 pm
- Contact:
Re: 1978 Rickenbacker 4008 8 String
Gee, and everyone was so kind and friendly, it's weird he doesn't want to post here anymore... 
-
blueflamerick
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 1943
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2003 1:43 pm
- Contact:
Re: 1978 Rickenbacker 4008 8 String
No one was unkind or unfriendly here. We were just letting holmes know that this bass wasn't what he thought it was, as well as laying out the information for any uninformed potential buyers.
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: 1978 Rickenbacker 4008 8 String
I think that my posts were accurate and to the point, Harry. I stated that I wasn't trying to be mean or negative. I told him that his bass may be a treasure, but it isn't a 4008.
I guess I didn't say "Welcome to the Forum" anywhere, but I don't think that all of the time that I put into providing accurate information (however difficult it may be to accept) should be interpreted as unkind or unfriendly.
I guess I didn't say "Welcome to the Forum" anywhere, but I don't think that all of the time that I put into providing accurate information (however difficult it may be to accept) should be interpreted as unkind or unfriendly.
Re: 1978 Rickenbacker 4008 8 String
The truth can be a hard pill to swallow. Sometimes there is no easy way to give a guy the truth other then to just say it straight out. I find it hard to believe that Rickenbacker verified that it was a 4008 in the first place. 
Never use money as a means to measure wealth
- hieronymous
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 837
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:46 pm
- Contact:
Re: 1978 Rickenbacker 4008 8 String
I don't want to be accusatory - though I think I was in my post - I just think that this was an opportunity for a new friend that may have been lost.
There is so much information now available on the internet and my impression is that instruments are greeted with greater scrutiny than in the past, which is great, but someone that bought an instrument like this in the '90s and didn't have that wealth of info available at the time may be in for a surprise. If I was in that position, I would like to be treated with some sympathy, that would make me feel more comfortable and open to dialog, instead of being handed the cold hard truth right off the bat.
But that's just me - I'm probably being over-sensitive so don't mind me.
There is so much information now available on the internet and my impression is that instruments are greeted with greater scrutiny than in the past, which is great, but someone that bought an instrument like this in the '90s and didn't have that wealth of info available at the time may be in for a surprise. If I was in that position, I would like to be treated with some sympathy, that would make me feel more comfortable and open to dialog, instead of being handed the cold hard truth right off the bat.
But that's just me - I'm probably being over-sensitive so don't mind me.
- rickenbrother
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 13201
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am
Re: 1978 Rickenbacker 4008 8 String
I didn't think anyone was rude to Ashe, just letting him know the truth.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! 
Re: 1978 Rickenbacker 4008 8 String
Agreed. Simply, the facts, and presented with respect. Like dog says, I think he probably found it tough to believe it wasn't what he thought it was...rickenbrother wrote:I didn't think anyone was rude to Ashe, just letting him know the truth.
Joey, hope you feel better man...
Re: 1978 Rickenbacker 4008 8 String
haha... I appreciate everyone taking my feelings into consideration! Ive been watching the forum replies from my phone the whole time... been on the road lately...wints wrote:Agreed. Simply, the facts, and presented with respect. Like dog says, I think he probably found it tough to believe it wasn't what he thought it was...rickenbrother wrote:I didn't think anyone was rude to Ashe, just letting him know the truth.
Still havent heard back from Rickenbacker as of yet.... dont know if I will.... one of the email addresses bounced.
FYI.. nobody was rude to me .... IVe found this thread rather entertaining as well as informative!
Cheers
Re: 1978 Rickenbacker 4008 8 String
Cool cool cool! 
