What's the difference between old en new 4005's?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
berth
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1723
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:06 am
Contact:

What's the difference between old en new 4005's?

Post by berth »

I know the older ones have toasters and full width inlay. Are there any other difference's? How do they compare in sound ?
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: What's the difference between old en new 4005's?

Post by sloop_john_b »

The necks did get bigger on 70's versions, but not by much.

Jeff Scott and I did a side-to-side A/B test at MARF 2007 - my '74 WB (w/ higains) vs. his '67 WB (w/ toasters). Both had Chromes. IMO, the tone of both instruments was extremely similar, with the '74 being louder.

I would not hesitate to go after a 70's one, unless you're a stickler for ridiculously slim necks, in which case you should wait for a 60's version.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: What's the difference between old en new 4005's?

Post by sloop_john_b »

I'll also add that I currently have a '66 WB, and I prefer the tone of my old '74.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37511
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: What's the difference between old en new 4005's?

Post by jps »

The headstock shape did the standard change from '60s voluptuous to modern squat, no walnut wings, but narrow shedua strip added to neck in place of wider walnut strip. Loss of plexi finger rest on newer ones.

I don't remember the tonal differences so go by John's assessment; he is younger and still has plenty of unfilled brain cells to store more data with.
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: What's the difference between old en new 4005's?

Post by paologregorio »

I know alot of my fellow forumites go ga ga over walnut wings, but am I the only one sees them and is instantly reminded of one of these?
butcher block maple and walnut cutting board..jpg
:lol:
User avatar
kennyhowes
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5022
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
Contact:

Re: What's the difference between old en new 4005's?

Post by kennyhowes »

sloop_john_b wrote:I would not hesitate to go after a 70's one, unless you're a stickler for ridiculously slim necks, in which case you should wait for a 60's version.
Seems like there's a lot more '60s ones out there than '70s, just from off-the-top-of-my-head statistics.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: What's the difference between old en new 4005's?

Post by sloop_john_b »

kennyhowes wrote: Seems like there's a lot more '60s ones out there than '70s, just from off-the-top-of-my-head statistics.
That's for sure, and the register confirms it: from '65 to '69, there are 44; from '70-'84, there are just 13.
User avatar
berth
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1723
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:06 am
Contact:

Re: What's the difference between old en new 4005's?

Post by berth »

sloop_john_b wrote: I would not hesitate to go after a 70's one.
I just paid for an 80's one a couple of days ago..... ;-)
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: What's the difference between old en new 4005's?

Post by rickaddict »

jps wrote:The headstock shape did the standard change from '60s voluptuous to modern squat...
:lol:

I like both. But I didn't like bulbous!
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: What's the difference between old en new 4005's?

Post by rickaddict »

berth wrote:&#!@. I just paid for an 80's one a couple of days ago..... ;-)
Congrats, Bert!

:wink:
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37511
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: What's the difference between old en new 4005's?

Post by jps »

Um.....pics! :roll:
:lol:
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: What's the difference between old en new 4005's?

Post by sloop_john_b »

berth wrote:
sloop_john_b wrote: I would not hesitate to go after a 70's one.
I just paid for an 80's one a couple of days ago..... ;-)
Even better - more rare! :lol:

Pics please!!!
User avatar
berth
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1723
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:06 am
Contact:

Re: What's the difference between old en new 4005's?

Post by berth »

jps wrote:Um.....pics! :roll: :lol:
sloop_john_b wrote: Even better - more rare! :lol:
Pics please!!!
Not Yet. The bass has not even shipped yet....
User avatar
berth
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1723
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:06 am
Contact:

Re: What's the difference between old en new 4005's?

Post by berth »

sloop_john_b wrote:Pics please!!!
Image

Image

More and better pics at the site of the previous owner
User avatar
kennyhowes
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5022
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
Contact:

Re: What's the difference between old en new 4005's?

Post by kennyhowes »

Wow, walnut!!! Nice arm mark too.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”