
Heel block – V63 vs. C64
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Heel block – V63 vs. C64
I was comparing the build of my '00 V63 and '09 C64 and noticed that the heel block is significantly larger on the V63 (left side in the photo). Anyone know why? And which is closer to the original 1999? Thanks in advance, Bill


Re: Heel block – V63 vs. C64
Don't know, Bill! But my '85 V is like your C64...
Andy
Andy
- stevebasshead
- Member
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 4:34 am
Re: Heel block – V63 vs. C64
It could also be that the necks are identical but it's where the wings join the neck that makes it appear as if the heel is offset. Do the body wings join the neck at the same place on both basses? I.e. if you flip them round and look to see whether the wings join above or below the last fret on both basses.
I mention this because there's a clear difference between my two 4003's and my '74 4001 so if I look at mine from the rear side by side I see a similar offset to yours. The upper wing on my 4003's joins just before the 20th fret and the lower wing just after. Whereas on my 4001 it's just after the 19th and just before the 20th respectively. The bridges are positioned accordingly too, on the 4003's they're inset from the body edge but on the 4001 it's right up against it which ties in with the wings being positioned where they are to keep the scale length correct.
Hope this helps,
Steve.
I mention this because there's a clear difference between my two 4003's and my '74 4001 so if I look at mine from the rear side by side I see a similar offset to yours. The upper wing on my 4003's joins just before the 20th fret and the lower wing just after. Whereas on my 4001 it's just after the 19th and just before the 20th respectively. The bridges are positioned accordingly too, on the 4003's they're inset from the body edge but on the 4001 it's right up against it which ties in with the wings being positioned where they are to keep the scale length correct.
Hope this helps,
Steve.
Re: Heel block – V63 vs. C64
My former '91 V63 is closer to your '00.
"The best things in life aren't things."
- BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
- Professional Player
- Posts: 1857
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm
Re: Heel block – V63 vs. C64
Bill...the one on the right of the pic is closest to my '64, but as previously said, it depends on where the wings were glued to the neck. The short wing on mine is glued 1/8" after the 20th fret. The long wing is glued between the 19th and 20th.
- rickenbrother
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 13194
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am
Re: Heel block – V63 vs. C64
My V63 from March '93:


JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! 
Re: Heel block – V63 vs. C64
The C64 is more accurate to the majority of the originals, in this regard. I have photos of RM1999s that are both ways. Here's a few original examples:


note this last one is more like the V63.



note this last one is more like the V63.

Re: Heel block – V63 vs. C64
Here's the front view of both basses. V63 on the left, C64 on the right. The wings appear to be glued at about the same place on the neck.


- BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
- Professional Player
- Posts: 1857
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm
Re: Heel block – V63 vs. C64
interesting that they both share a same rear pickup surround shape but the inner curve of the pickguards are different.
Re: Heel block – V63 vs. C64
They do vary. My '79 has the right body wing set a little higher than the left one - the bottom of the bass has a slight angle to it.
Re: Heel block – V63 vs. C64
IF memory is correct, I believe this was the same situation with the CS models as well. 
Re: Heel block – V63 vs. C64
Here's the back of my '92 V63.


-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: Heel block – V63 vs. C64
The back of my May '93 V63:
