The "John Hall Question" thread yanked?
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
-
spike
The "John Hall Question" thread yanked?
I've been away and I've come back to find the topic missing. I'm interested in knowing what caused it to
get pulled.
get pulled.
- soundmasterg
- RRF Consultant
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 1:06 pm
Fair questions. Please see the discussion under the Rickenbacker Basses topic.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm
Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
-
shamustwin
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5287
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:00 am
- greg_mitchell
- Junior Member
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 7:17 pm
- Contact:
What did you guys do? What did I miss?
LET THE WORLD KNOW YOU WANT PAUL TO BRING BACK THE 4001. JOIN OUR FACEBOOK GROUP!! http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=147641915268984
Its been awhile, but If I remember correctly, there was an issue of specific RIC parts being discontinued. Particularly, the re-issue horseshoe pickup. Then someone came along with a non RIC replacement, people got crazy, the forum started choosing sides, Peter pulled the post to try to difuse the situation, and,,,basicaly JH got tired of trying to defend the company name and went home.
There may have been more to it than that, but thats my take on the situation.
He still comes back once in a while. But is missed as a full time contributer.
Sigh,,,,,its just like everything else in life, you dont know what you got until its gone.
There may have been more to it than that, but thats my take on the situation.
He still comes back once in a while. But is missed as a full time contributer.
Sigh,,,,,its just like everything else in life, you dont know what you got until its gone.

"Knowledge is Power"
Thanks for the info. I do remember seeing that series of posts. If RIC didn't have the replacement part was JH upset because others were advising on how to get a non-RIC part for replacement, or because he was being called to task by some?
Anyway, I hope he comes back. His input is one of the strengths of this forum.
Anyway, I hope he comes back. His input is one of the strengths of this forum.
LET THE WORLD KNOW YOU WANT PAUL TO BRING BACK THE 4001. JOIN OUR FACEBOOK GROUP!! http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=147641915268984
-
jwr2
Unless a part is protected by a patent, it can be made. AFAIK they have no unexpired patents at present.
Of course, in making the part you can't violate a Rickenbacker trademark. You can make a six-pole Alnico pickup and wind it to 7.4Kohms using #44AWG. But you can't call it a toaster or toaster-top because those names belong to RIC. You can make a pickup cover for it, but you can't duplicate the toaster-top style cover because that is trademarked "trade dress". You can make an original style pickup with a horseshoe magnet, but you can't call it a "horseshoe pickup" because that name is trademarked by RIC.
I don't see how RIC is preventing anyone from getting parts or shutting anyone down other than people who violate their trademarks.
Of course, in making the part you can't violate a Rickenbacker trademark. You can make a six-pole Alnico pickup and wind it to 7.4Kohms using #44AWG. But you can't call it a toaster or toaster-top because those names belong to RIC. You can make a pickup cover for it, but you can't duplicate the toaster-top style cover because that is trademarked "trade dress". You can make an original style pickup with a horseshoe magnet, but you can't call it a "horseshoe pickup" because that name is trademarked by RIC.
I don't see how RIC is preventing anyone from getting parts or shutting anyone down other than people who violate their trademarks.
- soundmasterg
- RRF Consultant
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 1:06 pm
Dave, has RIC in fact trademarked the name "horseshoe pickup?" I wouldn't think you can trademark something that basically describes what type of pickup it is. That would be like trying to trademark "humbucking pickup" or something....although if they haven't already, I wouldn't put it past Gibson to try.
