The "John Hall Question" thread yanked?

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

spike

The "John Hall Question" thread yanked?

Post by spike »

I've been away and I've come back to find the topic missing. I'm interested in knowing what caused it to
get pulled.
User avatar
soundmasterg
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1923
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 1:06 pm

Post by soundmasterg »

Yes I noticed it was yanked too. I have no idea what caused it to get pulled. I woke up the other day and it was gone.
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

I think this is best left un-explored. Suffice it to say it was contrary to the spirit of this great forum and no good was going to come from it. The cancellation was partially my fault but I can't take all of the blame.
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 15135
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by admin »

Fair questions. Please see the discussion under the Rickenbacker Basses topic.
Life, as with music, often requires one to let go of the melody and listen to the rhythm

Please join the Official RickResource Forum Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/groups/379271585440277
tonewerks
Junior Member
Posts: 154
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2003 12:20 pm
Contact:

Post by tonewerks »

was this the what's on order thread?
spike

Post by spike »

No, it was a now deleted thread regarding the availability of horseshoe pickups.
shamustwin
Senior Member
Posts: 5287
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 5:00 am

Post by shamustwin »

I tried not to say anything wrong. Was it me?
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

No, I don't think so Jerry. It was just a whirlwind of nonsense that swept up several of us. Me included.
User avatar
greg_mitchell
Junior Member
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 7:17 pm
Contact:

Post by greg_mitchell »

Same thing happened last week on the Fender page on a question about Carol Kaye.
I'd rather die while I'm livin' that live while I'm dead!
User avatar
simer4001
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 8:14 pm

Post by simer4001 »

What did you guys do? What did I miss?
LET THE WORLD KNOW YOU WANT PAUL TO BRING BACK THE 4001. JOIN OUR FACEBOOK GROUP!! http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=147641915268984
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6263
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Post by cheyenne »

Its been awhile, but If I remember correctly, there was an issue of specific RIC parts being discontinued. Particularly, the re-issue horseshoe pickup. Then someone came along with a non RIC replacement, people got crazy, the forum started choosing sides, Peter pulled the post to try to difuse the situation, and,,,basicaly JH got tired of trying to defend the company name and went home.

There may have been more to it than that, but thats my take on the situation.

He still comes back once in a while. But is missed as a full time contributer.

Sigh,,,,,its just like everything else in life, you dont know what you got until its gone. Image
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
simer4001
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 8:14 pm

Post by simer4001 »

Thanks for the info. I do remember seeing that series of posts. If RIC didn't have the replacement part was JH upset because others were advising on how to get a non-RIC part for replacement, or because he was being called to task by some?

Anyway, I hope he comes back. His input is one of the strengths of this forum.
LET THE WORLD KNOW YOU WANT PAUL TO BRING BACK THE 4001. JOIN OUR FACEBOOK GROUP!! http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=147641915268984
jwr2

Post by jwr2 »

Ric doesn't seem to want to sell spare parts ... and then they seem to shut down some of the people making spare parts ... Ric is concerned with their copyrights and trademarks ... but us end users are more concerned with getting parts ...
dave4004
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1113
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 7:49 pm

Post by dave4004 »

Unless a part is protected by a patent, it can be made. AFAIK they have no unexpired patents at present.

Of course, in making the part you can't violate a Rickenbacker trademark. You can make a six-pole Alnico pickup and wind it to 7.4Kohms using #44AWG. But you can't call it a toaster or toaster-top because those names belong to RIC. You can make a pickup cover for it, but you can't duplicate the toaster-top style cover because that is trademarked "trade dress". You can make an original style pickup with a horseshoe magnet, but you can't call it a "horseshoe pickup" because that name is trademarked by RIC.

I don't see how RIC is preventing anyone from getting parts or shutting anyone down other than people who violate their trademarks.
User avatar
soundmasterg
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1923
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 1:06 pm

Post by soundmasterg »

Dave, has RIC in fact trademarked the name "horseshoe pickup?" I wouldn't think you can trademark something that basically describes what type of pickup it is. That would be like trying to trademark "humbucking pickup" or something....although if they haven't already, I wouldn't put it past Gibson to try.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”