Suggestions for next Rick

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
allmodcons
New member
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 10:53 pm

Post by allmodcons »

If I had a few extra grand to blow, I would get a Pete Townshend signature model, complemented by his signature model Gibson SG. Image By the way, that Ric acoustic is cooool!!
profjeff

Post by profjeff »

Wow. Lot's to think about! Thanks for the suggestions. How long is the wait for an acoustic?
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12658
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Post by doctorwho »

Profjeff, check out this thread for your answer:

../14/23195.html"#EECD9C">
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
profjeff

Post by profjeff »

Any opinions regarding rosewood vs. maple on the Rick dreadnaughts?

BTW...here's a photo on my UNC website

http://www.coe.unco.edu/jeffbauer
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12658
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Post by doctorwho »

Very cool, Proffjeff! I take it that your Ph.D. is in education? Mine is in Organic Chemistry (University of Illinois, Urbana-CHampaign) but I am an analytical chemist by vocation.

My 730 is the all-maple Laramie. The only rosewood acoustic I have played is my 1960s Coronet 680-D:

Image

The Coronet is actually a fine guitar (real abalone inlays). The Laramie sounds more full, i.e. there are more overtones present compared to the Coronet. This is only a crude comparison and may not be representative of the differences between a Laramie and a Shiloh.
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
wormdiet
Intermediate Member
Posts: 649
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 5:22 pm

Post by wormdiet »

I'd go for the 380L PZ, the 381, or a 325c58. Of those three I've only played the last, but it had an amazing capacity for a warm, deep, almost jazzy tone.
"The only worthwhile conquests are those wrested from ignorance"
-Napoleon
User avatar
longhouse
Advanced Member
Posts: 2103
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 6:43 pm
Contact:

Post by longhouse »

Jeff, I tried two jumbo Ric acoustics side-by-side at Dave's Guitars in LaCrosse, WI a few years ago. The maple Comstock blew me away. It killed every Gibson, Martin, Taylor, and Guild in the place off the walls. My fellow Foglifter Tony agreed. The rosewood jumbo was very pretty, but sounded dead and dry as toast in comparison to its sister. It could have been due in part to dead strings, but the maple Ric was breathtaking in sound and appearance. I still hate myself for not buying it.
Cheers, Noel
Shaking the floor of Heaven
User avatar
melibreits
Senior Member
Posts: 4081
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2003 6:00 am
Contact:

Post by melibreits »

I agree with Noel; the Comstock is an awesome acoustic guitar with its own unique sound: crisp and bright and percussive, and very loud as well, even though mine does not have the electronic pickup. It is truly an incredible-sounding guitar, and feels absolutely wonderful to play....and it looks just as good as it sounds--mine is Fireglo, but I bet one in Monty would be beautiful, too.
"Once I've held and played the best, baby, I won't settle for less!"
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”