4001 or 4003

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 4001 or 4003

Post by jps »

At our gig three weeks ago:
Orangeman
New member
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 2:28 pm

Re: 4001 or 4003

Post by Orangeman »

Thanx all!!!
User avatar
morrow
Member
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2005 12:09 pm

Re: 4001 or 4003

Post by morrow »

A friend here picked up a 2010 4003 because he liked my '80 4001 ( a lot ) . The neck on the new one is about as close to my '80 as you could get , in fact they feel about the same . I was quite surprised to see just how close they felt .

Mine sports an ancient set of flats and his has rounds so it's hard to compare the sound .

The new ones are gorgeous , the older ones are too .
MaplegloMatt
Junior Member
Posts: 148
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 9:28 pm

Re: 4001 or 4003

Post by MaplegloMatt »

Having had both a 4001 and 4003, I'd lean towards a 4003. It's tone is not quite a versatile as a 4001 but I think they are built a little tougher and of course the truss rods adjust easier. I'd also buy new. I think current production is some of the best quality ever made and with the push/pull tone pot you can get very close to the old 4001 sound. Now if they only offered a current "s" model I would have bought new! :)
User avatar
ram
Senior Member
Posts: 3743
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:55 pm

Re: 4001 or 4003

Post by ram »

I'd have to go with my 4001 -I've had it since '74 and just got finished adding a Horseshoe and a Toaster to it! What's not to like. Still my fave neck on a bass!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”