1968 4001

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
johnnysain
Member
Posts: 467
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 8:00 am

Re: 1968 4001

Post by johnnysain »

There is a reason it never left the factory.

That is the best action achieveable after a pro set up?
Rickenbacker player since 1978
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: 1968 4001

Post by ken_j »

Having purchased a new "68 4000 I will say that the action was high straight out of the factory with the bridge bottomed out as low as it would go, so this would not surprise me. I had to sand the bottom of the bridge to get it playable. A friend's '69 4001 was the same way. The nut on my '68 was back. The factory strings were also black with yellow/gold silks.
Attachments
Ric4000-post.jpg
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
badeggs
Intermediate Member
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:04 am

Re: 1968 4001

Post by badeggs »

Shells from Okinawa, right...gotta give him credit for his imagination!

But $10,500 for a bowed neck that he swears up-and-down plays beautifully? I don't think so...
rickfan63
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 8:30 am

Re: 1968 4001

Post by rickfan63 »

ilan wrote:The action is very high and the bridge looks bottomed out. Otherwise, DROOL.
Yeah, I noticed that high action too and the bridge as well. Other than that, the bass is absolutely beautiful to be as old as it is. Very nice wood used on it. It has been well cared for. Another thing I noticed in the close ups is that the finish dosen't seem to be as heavily applied on the fretboard and built up on the side of the frets as it is as on some more current examples. Mine included.

I love the wider gap in the HS too, as well as the crushed pearl inlays These don't come along often.

If the neck is indeed bowed, it can be repaired if you know what you are doing.

Vintage instruments are always going to be ridiculously priced. I once saw a '52 Fender P-bass priced at $25,000, it looked like someone had used it for a battleaxe.....in a real battle LOL! Even 70's F's, which were considered junk by a lot of musicians back then, are outrageously priced now IMHO. So as rare as a 60's RIC 4001 is, the asking price is not too suprising to me.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: 1968 4001

Post by rickaddict »

Beautiful bass! I loves me a nice '68. Only way to improve upon it (aside from the neck issue) would be if it had a hi-gain bridge pickup. But that's easy enough to fix. :twisted:
It even has its original Pyramid flatwound strings that came with the bass when new in 1968.

Really?
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 1968 4001

Post by jingle_jangle »

It could be fixed once and for all by pulling that gorgeous fretboard, routing the neck and fitting one non-adjustable square carbon fiber rod, only 1/4" X 1/4" in cross-section, to stiffen up the neck without adding weight or affecting either balance or appearance. Glue back up, rebind, touch up the varnish, and clank without fear.

Yeah, I know, then it wouldn't be 100% original, though the action would then be to die for.

But at $10,500.00 who's gonna risk it?

The paradox of originality VS utility VS beauty.
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Re: 1968 4001

Post by ilan »

So that's how it's done... I'd have it done if this was my bass. Will it have functioning truss rods after that?
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 1968 4001

Post by jingle_jangle »

100% functioning truss rods. This just gives the original rods some back-up to counteract string tension.

Those early necks can be flexy flyers.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: 1968 4001

Post by rickaddict »

I wonder if the strings really are Pyramids. 'Cuz if they are, then swapping them out for RIC/Maximas or TI Jazz flats would go a long way toward fixing that bow.

I wouldn't be willing to take a chance on it though for $10,500...

8)
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: 1968 4001

Post by johnhall »

jingle_jangle wrote:"Note the crushed shell inlays in the fingerboard. Ric quit using this unique material around 1972-3 because it became unavailable. This type of shell comes from a small chain of islands near Okinawa that are now protected as a national park, hence the material is not only unavailable, but strictly protected."

Quite a yarn-spinner. We gotta have him over to the next BARC...
Err, this is actually true.

Most of that shell material came from Kohamajima Island, Okinawa, which was turned into a protected marine reserve a number of years ago. A number of years ago I visited Ishigaki Island, which is the next island over from it in the Straits of Taiwan, to see if its abundant supplies of shell material could be utilized as a replacement but there were just too many hoops to jump through on that one.

I did some diving in the South China Sea there, between Kohamajima and Iriomote Island, and it was both interesting and frustrating to see so much fingerboard inlay material lying on the seafloor! Bu it's probably best that it stays there.
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: 1968 4001

Post by teeder »

That's way too much $$$'s, IMO.
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 1968 4001

Post by jingle_jangle »

johnhall wrote:
jingle_jangle wrote:"Note the crushed shell inlays in the fingerboard. Ric quit using this unique material around 1972-3 because it became unavailable. This type of shell comes from a small chain of islands near Okinawa that are now protected as a national park, hence the material is not only unavailable, but strictly protected."

Quite a yarn-spinner. We gotta have him over to the next BARC...
Err, this is actually true.

Most of that shell material came from Kohamajima Island, Okinawa, which was turned into a protected marine reserve a number of years ago. A number of years ago I visited Ishigaki Island, which is the next island over from it in the Straits of Taiwan, to see if its abundant supplies of shell material could be utilized as a replacement but there were just too many hoops to jump through on that one.

I did some diving in the South China Sea there, between Kohamajima and Iriomote Island, and it was both interesting and frustrating to see so much fingerboard inlay material lying on the seafloor! Bu it's probably best that it stays there.
Thanks!

I wonder where the seller read/heard this?
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 1968 4001

Post by sloop_john_b »

johnhall wrote: I did some diving in the South China Sea there, between Kohamajima and Iriomote Island, and it was both interesting and frustrating to see so much fingerboard inlay material lying on the seafloor! Bu it's probably best that it stays there.
:lol:
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Re: 1968 4001

Post by leftybass »

Interesting that it's a '68 and has Rick-O-Sound.
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Re: 1968 4001

Post by ilan »

No kidding. I was sure this was a synthetic material. Oh well, we live and learn.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”