No kidding! Us Ric folks do have twisted minds, don't we?sloop_john_b wrote:johnhall wrote: I did some diving in the South China Sea there, between Kohamajima and Iriomote Island, and it was both interesting and frustrating to see so much fingerboard inlay material lying on the seafloor! Bu it's probably best that it stays there.
1968 4001
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
- gearhed289
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 651
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:51 am
- Contact:
Re: 1968 4001
Re: 1968 4001
That was my first thought John. Earliest I have seen with ROS, and my Dec 68 is still mono. Great bass, possibly one of the Scott Jennings batch?leftybass wrote:Interesting that it's a '68 and has Rick-O-Sound.
First thing to do is GET THOSE STRINGS OFF!
Get a light set of 40-95's on there and let that neck find out what it can do. Those strings look like cables!
Beautiful MG, with that wonderful aged Amberglo, all original, and certainly one of the best out there from an aesthetic standpoint.
10K? Unlikely, and probably not until that action has been sorted...
- sloop_john_b
- Rick-a-holic
- Posts: 13843
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am
Re: 1968 4001
Yep, sounds like it.wints wrote:Great bass, possibly one of the Scott Jennings batch?
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: 1968 4001
I wonder if sparkly inlay material could be reasonably faked using some sort of U.S. sourced abalone (not sure if that's even legally obtainable) or similar shell?johnhall wrote: Err, this is actually true.
Most of that shell material came from Kohamajima Island, Okinawa, which was turned into a protected marine reserve a number of years ago. A number of years ago I visited Ishigaki Island, which is the next island over from it in the Straits of Taiwan, to see if its abundant supplies of shell material could be utilized as a replacement but there were just too many hoops to jump through on that one.
I did some diving in the South China Sea there, between Kohamajima and Iriomote Island, and it was both interesting and frustrating to see so much fingerboard inlay material lying on the seafloor! Bu it's probably best that it stays there.
Re: 1968 4001
Much too high on the price. Sorry bu I gotta believe this bass doesn't play well with that action. Instruments need to be played, have adjustments made to over the years etc. Kinda like not hugging your child .
- FretlessOnly
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 1605
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:00 pm
Re: 1968 4001
You know, some of us love high action. But only if it's not an artifact of unadjustable neck bow.
Not willing to figure it out for that price.
Not willing to figure it out for that price.
Can we have everything louder than everything else?
Re: 1968 4001
+1 I'll bet that neck is just fine. It just needs some pro setup work.wints wrote: First thing to do is GET THOSE STRINGS OFF!
Get a light set of 40-95's on there and let that neck find out what it can do. Those strings look like cables!
"Knowledge is Power"
-
rickaddict
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6163
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am
Re: 1968 4001
But this bass left the factory in the late 80's. Maybe it was completed using some current parts (wiring harness and retro-stamped jack plate).wints wrote:That was my first thought John. Earliest I have seen with ROS, and my Dec 68 is still mono. Great bass, possibly one of the Scott Jennings batch?leftybass wrote:Interesting that it's a '68 and has Rick-O-Sound.
Re: 1968 4001
The auction now says Maxima strings and also addresses the setup.
He also stated the horseshoe pickup is mounted offset and not correctly aligned over the E string. Look at the shoes and the more open gap is on the D and G side, not the E and A side. Current pickup coils have one pole pushed out further, and if the older coils are the same, as I suspect, then turning the whole treble pickup assembly 180 degrees would not only put the more open shoe over the E and A strings, but also align the poles of the coil on the strings correctly.
He also stated the horseshoe pickup is mounted offset and not correctly aligned over the E string. Look at the shoes and the more open gap is on the D and G side, not the E and A side. Current pickup coils have one pole pushed out further, and if the older coils are the same, as I suspect, then turning the whole treble pickup assembly 180 degrees would not only put the more open shoe over the E and A strings, but also align the poles of the coil on the strings correctly.
Re: 1968 4001
And my bass (April '69) is also mono.... this eBay '68 was more than likely ordered that way as an option.wints wrote:...That was my first thought John. Earliest I have seen with ROS, and my Dec 68 is still mono.
Mark Walker's '68 would be a good one to compare to this eBay bass.
Re: 1968 4001
Jeff, I tend to think that HH serial is original, and like John S posted, ordered this way. Jeff Rath's Sept 68, a month older, was mono IIRC as well.rickaddict wrote:But this bass left the factory in the late 80's. Maybe it was completed using some current parts (wiring harness and retro-stamped jack plate).wints wrote:That was my first thought John. Earliest I have seen with ROS, and my Dec 68 is still mono. Great bass, possibly one of the Scott Jennings batch?leftybass wrote:Interesting that it's a '68 and has Rick-O-Sound.
- BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
- Professional Player
- Posts: 1857
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm
Re: 1968 4001
my oct. '68 is mono with a black nut. i have no neck pull at the joint on any of my three, and my '68 has a third thinner fretboard.
Re: 1968 4001
$10,500 isn't enough for him? He has to charge $58.64 for shipping? 
Re: 1968 4001
That's relatively cheap to ship a guitar, shipping on my Ric+OHSC was hovering above 80$ including insurance.simer4001 wrote:$10,500 isn't enough for him? He has to charge $58.64 for shipping?
Re: 1968 4001
Maybe, but for $10.5k you'd think he could spring for shipping.Spike- wrote:That's relatively cheap to ship a guitar, shipping on my Ric+OHSC was hovering above 80$ including insurance.simer4001 wrote:$10,500 isn't enough for him? He has to charge $58.64 for shipping?
