The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Modern years of Rickenbacker Guitars from 1984 to the present

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
wim
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 1:37 am

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by wim »

Wildberry wrote:
wim wrote:Bridge position seems to have moved also.
In what way, as I don't see any difference in Kees' examples?
neck joins the body 1 fret further on the 2010 model.
Bridge position thus moved forward (to neck) too, it's now in the middle of the cat slash, if you'd draw a line through the bridge.
Could be the angle of the pictures too though.
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by electrofaro »

wim wrote:Bridge position thus moved forward (to neck) too, it's now in the middle of the cat slash, if you'd draw a line through the bridge.
Could be the angle of the pictures too though.
There seems to be a slight variation, but even in 21 fret models the bridge is pretty much in the same place as it's now? Or might that just be the pictures I chose at random?
Clint wrote:To me, the biggest change is in the width of the R tailpiece ramp. It's a lot narrower now and doesn't follow the curve of the pickguard.
Now, I never noticed that before - but you're absolutely right! I love the wider ramp to the smaller one. Smaller ramp means more inside space?

What I always thought was quite weird is what I call the "square" area of the body - compare 330 top to side rounding of edge around neck to a 360's. Why is the 360's transition less rounded??? In pictures it's not that obvious, I think, but hang a 360 and a 330 next to eachother and see it for yourself.
3183283232_a68dc26b87_z.jpg
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
BILLYC58
New member
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 12:14 pm

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by BILLYC58 »

This is very interesting so are these changes for looks or an improvement ?
Billy
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by jingle_jangle »

I thought they were for consistency, until the latest one came out...

Image

Now, all bets are off...
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by winston »

Oh my........ :lol:
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by jps »

Kind of Wandre-esque. :shock:
User avatar
antipodean
Senior Member
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:27 am

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by antipodean »

That was a 1975 one-off made for Salvador Dali.
"I don't want to sound incredulous but I can't believe it" Rex Mossop
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by jingle_jangle »

The mini on the left is the short scale version. :wink:
egosheep
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:29 pm
Contact:

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by egosheep »

Clint wrote:To me, the biggest change is in the width of the R tailpiece ramp. It's a lot narrower now and doesn't follow the curve of the pickguard.
+1. I mentioned this in a previous thread here. Dunno why the ramps are like this in the CNC era.
Great Ramp In My Opinion.
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by electrofaro »

egosheep wrote:Dunno why the ramps are like this in the CNC era.
When did they change over to CNC? I thought that was before 2009 already? The new ramp's ugly.

There are online ads for 2009 and 2010 models with pictures showing something between the correct ramp and the new deformed one... looks almost like it gradually got smaller over a year or so!
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by jingle_jangle »

Wildberry wrote:
egosheep wrote:Dunno why the ramps are like this in the CNC era.
When did they change over to CNC? I thought that was before 2009 already? The new ramp's ugly.

There are online ads for 2009 and 2010 models with pictures showing something between the correct ramp and the new deformed one... looks almost like it gradually got smaller over a year or so!
CNC "era" began two decades ago, roughly...but it wasn't a complete changeover. Things are still being introduced, standardized and massaged.
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by electrofaro »

Well, I think it's good they dare to change details of such a classic design.

Is it just me, or don't people really like it, though?

Rather than mess up the ramp width, they ough to give the body edges on both sides of the neck the same body to side rounding as on a 330 body edge. It looks too square on 360s imo in those spots.

I guess we must all be a bit obsessed with details? :lol:
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
larsongs
Member
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 pm

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by larsongs »

Love to hear Rickenbacker chime in, pun intended 8) , & discuss the reasons for all the changes.

Glenn
sleepingtiger
New member
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 2:53 am

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by sleepingtiger »

I never noticed a recent change...Hmmm....

Tony
User avatar
trosse
New member
Posts: 84
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 2:31 pm

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by trosse »

jingle_jangle wrote:I thought they were for consistency, until the latest one came out...

Image

Now, all bets are off...
This one was build in the glory days when Ray Charles workwed at Rickenbackér for a short time :D
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Modern Years - After 1983”