1969 4001

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
marc61
Senior Member
Posts: 6443
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 9:31 am
Contact:

Re: 1969 4001

Post by marc61 »

Definite WOW factor on that one. Enjoy Kev
User avatar
s4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3514
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: 1969 4001

Post by s4001 »

Not to derail, but the heels of my HD '68
Attachments
102_1677 LR.jpg
102_1678 LR.jpg
User avatar
pag
Intermediate Member
Posts: 515
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:37 am

Re: 1969 4001

Post by pag »

Thanks for the info guys.
Keeping on the rails as it were,its great to see a great looking bass like this 1969 4001 bacause we see so many early 70s pieces and theres any number of threads regarding RMs etc.
But the period from 1966-70 is very intriguing in that the 4001 was slowly evolving and the round heel and volute seemed to creep in while no one was looking!

What does she sound like through a well cranked up amp?
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: 1969 4001

Post by teeder »

I haven't run it through my "big" amp, but it sounds great through my V4-B and a 2X10 cab cranked up. (which is plenty loud!)
Someone asked how it compares to my 21 fretter. I was messing with both of them over the weekend, and in a nut-shell, the '69 is warmer and more open, and the '71 has much more hi-end and tight sounding. May have to do with the pu positions (?).
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: 1969 4001

Post by henry5 »

With the exception of the "more hi-end", that was essentially the difference between your old/my 21 fretter and my fave '72.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: 1969 4001

Post by johnallg »

She is a real beaut Kevin! You did really good getting that one. Enjoy!
User avatar
JohnCovach
New member
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:59 pm
Contact:

Re: 1969 4001

Post by JohnCovach »

And now for the horseshoe, right?
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: 1969 4001

Post by johnallg »

The horseshoe pups were gone in mid-68.
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: 1969 4001

Post by teeder »

johnallg wrote:The horseshoe pups were gone in mid-68.
Wints had a Feb '69 4001 with a serial# 5 digits after this one that had a factory HS, but his Dec (?) '68 has a Hi-gain. So, there was definitely a phase out period.

I would like to try out the Lollar in this bass, though there's nothing wrong with the HG in it now.
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Re: 1969 4001

Post by leftybass »

Kevin, did you check the pot date codes yet...? Curious how close they are to the dates in my own '69....
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: 1969 4001

Post by teeder »

Not yet, but I'm running home for lunch in a little bit and will open 'er up for a peak.
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: 1969 4001

Post by teeder »

leftybass wrote:Kevin, did you check the pot date codes yet...? Curious how close they are to the dates in my own '69....
The 3 I could see are "6808".
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Re: 1969 4001

Post by leftybass »

teeder wrote:
leftybass wrote:Kevin, did you check the pot date codes yet...? Curious how close they are to the dates in my own '69....
The 3 I could see are "6808".
Ahh. That is what is in my '69 as well, and I think it was Andy who also had one like that... Good to know.
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Re: 1969 4001

Post by wints »

teeder wrote:
johnallg wrote:The horseshoe pups were gone in mid-68.
Wints had a Feb '69 4001 with a serial# 5 digits after this one that had a factory HS, but his Dec (?) '68 has a Hi-gain. So, there was definitely a phase out period.

I would like to try out the Lollar in this bass, though there's nothing wrong with the HG in it now.
I had IB 101, which was one # before Kev's old MG 4000, (that also had a hi-gain) and that did have a HS, which is the latest bass I know of, which I can definitely authenticate. Pot codes were 6808 as well, and I'm sure if I opened the hood on my Dec '68, (which I have never done) they would be the same as well...
User avatar
fran4001
Intermediate Member
Posts: 878
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 2:25 pm
Contact:

Re: 1969 4001

Post by fran4001 »

Andy's welcome to post pics of my old Jan. '69 Burgundyglo. That one was #IA-007, and according to my old notes, were also using 6808 pots. Also had the green first gen. hi-gain treble pu. Would love to know where that bass went after CME got it 10 yrs. ago!!!!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”