New RIC 4004Cii Special

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
superdick2112
Member
Posts: 256
Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 11:46 am

Re: New RIC 4004Cii Special

Post by superdick2112 »

Never noticed it before, but now I see that my '08 4003 has "The Hump". Odd, but I think I can live with it.

Yet another advantage for the mighty 4004 - my Cii will never suffer from this issue! :wink:
Ivan3000
Advanced Member
Posts: 2392
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:53 pm

Re: New RIC 4004Cii Special

Post by Ivan3000 »

ilan wrote:Image
It's below the switch. The Jetglo (L) is pre-hump, the Fireglo (R) has it.

Minutia, but once you notice it, you can't not notice it.
I kind of like the double hump one better.
CJ: Thanks for explaining that, I understand it now!
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: New RIC 4004Cii Special

Post by johnhall »

Even a camel can tell you two humps are better than one.
User avatar
heinpete
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 10:08 pm

Re: New RIC 4004Cii Special

Post by heinpete »

ilan wrote:Image
It's below the switch. The Jetglo (L) is pre-hump, the Fireglo (R) has it.
Minutia, but once you notice it, you can't not notice it.
:shock: ...the hump even looks worse with the more parallel (even rhombus) like positioned knobs on the pick guard! :(
It is just more harmonic if the pick guard edge lines up with the binding. :roll:
User avatar
heinpete
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 10:08 pm

Re: New RIC 4004Cii Special

Post by heinpete »

johnhall wrote:Even a camel can tell you two humps are better than one.
... but what does the Dromedar say? :wink:
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: New RIC 4004Cii Special

Post by electrofaro »

heinpete wrote:
johnhall wrote:Even a camel can tell you two humps are better than one.
... but what does the Dromedar say? :wink:
That a camel is a dromedar with two humps!
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2780
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: New RIC 4004Cii Special

Post by henry5 »

fretless wrote:
ajish4 wrote:Nice flame!

I'm really glad to see some experimental work being done on the 4004cii.

It looks more MONTY than a Walnut, but STILL my FAVORITE color scheme.

I really hope some of you 4003 guys would give these a try.

I can't wait to try the new neck profile! Even with the old neck profile, I miss my Blueburst.
As fate would have it, OLIVIA"s now has my very bass on Ebay.

It really is such a versatile bass, just like a Pbass on steroids with some classic RIC tones thrown in to boot.
I saw that up there such a beautiful bass and they took stellar pics of it , really stunning . That one off is sweet too . Mine has a birthday coming up
TWric.jpg
Man that's a nice bass (I'm a "blue" freak).
User avatar
coolhandjjl
Intermediate Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:42 pm

Re: New RIC 4004Cii Special

Post by coolhandjjl »

heinpete wrote:...the hump even looks worse with the more parallel (even rhombus) like positioned knobs on the pick guard!
When I was modding my 1993 4003S earlier this year, I sent Tony my original factory pickguard as a template for making his 'vintage' style guard with 1/2" spacing to go with my RIHS and Toaster. I'm glad I did. Not only is it a one humper, it also sports unparallel knobs. Definitely more teardrop, organic shaped.
'09 4003 | '93 4003s
John Luke aka Coolhand
User avatar
ricosound
Intermediate Member
Posts: 759
Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2003 11:36 am

Re: New RIC 4004Cii Special

Post by ricosound »

Has anyone tried the new 4004 with the narrow 4003 neck dimensions and 2-piece blank? I have to believe they would be a real winner :D
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: New RIC 4004Cii Special

Post by jps »

ricosound wrote:Has anyone tried the new 4004 with the narrow 4003 neck dimensions and 2-piece blank? I have to believe they would be a real winner :D
Someone send me one to try, please. :wink:
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: New RIC 4004Cii Special

Post by cassius987 »

ilan wrote:Image
It's below the switch. The Jetglo (L) is pre-hump, the Fireglo (R) has it.

Minutia, but once you notice it, you can't not notice it.
Minutia indeed...
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: New RIC 4004Cii Special

Post by cassius987 »

ricosound wrote:Has anyone tried the new 4004 with the narrow 4003 neck dimensions and 2-piece blank? I have to believe they would be a real winner :D
I've tried two or three--I can't remember exactly, as I've played a bunch of different 4004s at Wildwood, but at least two were two-piece necks. Honestly I didn't like it any better than the one-piece as far as feel. Tone was a bit different though, a bit "cleaner" perhaps... hard to describe really, as the difference was subtle at best. I think the biggest advantage is the two-piece construction is going to cut back big time on the amount of maintenance and the number of lemons.
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: New RIC 4004Cii Special

Post by teeder »

jps wrote:
ricosound wrote:Has anyone tried the new 4004 with the narrow 4003 neck dimensions and 2-piece blank? I have to believe they would be a real winner :D
Someone send me one to try, please. :wink:
I get it after Jeff is done! :mrgreen:

I've wanted a 4004 for a couple years, but don't like the large neck shapes.
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: New RIC 4004Cii Special

Post by ken_j »

cassius987 wrote:
ricosound wrote:Has anyone tried the new 4004 with the narrow 4003 neck dimensions and 2-piece blank? I have to believe they would be a real winner :D
I've tried two or three--I can't remember exactly, as I've played a bunch of different 4004s at Wildwood, but at least two were two-piece necks. Honestly I didn't like it any better than the one-piece as far as feel. Tone was a bit different though, a bit "cleaner" perhaps... hard to describe really, as the difference was subtle at best. I think the biggest advantage is the two-piece construction is going to cut back big time on the amount of maintenance and the number of lemons.
Earlier this year I was at my local RIC dealer and they had just received a new 4003 with a two piece neck and an older used one. The new 4003 neck was wider as it neared the body than the older one. Is it possible that when RIC went to the common neck for both that it is a compromise between the two sizes? or possibly just two extremes of what is in the tolerence window?
Also If I recall correctly, years ago I purchased a mid '70s 4001 that I wanted to put a new bridge on. This one had already been chisseled out for a Badass II. I tried to use the Schaller bridge (current production on the 4004) and I couldn't get the string spacing narrow enough. This may also be a reason for a compromised neck width as you go higher in the register. These are all just guesses on my part.
"The best things in life aren't things."
Ivan3000
Advanced Member
Posts: 2392
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:53 pm

Re: New RIC 4004Cii Special

Post by Ivan3000 »

IvanMunoz wrote:
ilan wrote:Image
It's below the switch. The Jetglo (L) is pre-hump, the Fireglo (R) has it.

Minutia, but once you notice it, you can't not notice it.
I kind of like the double hump one better.
CJ: Thanks for explaining that, I understand it now!
I'm gonna recede that statement and say I like the single hump better. I was at SamAsh in NY and I saw a 2011 and a 1976 near eachother. The single hump looks much better, it goes with the shape of the body a lot better. I guess you really have to see it in person to notice the real difference. :roll: :mrgreen:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”