4005 Project

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

David and Jerry thank you. I will be asking both of you and Jeff Scott for a lot of details as I work through the planning. Seeing as they are handmade there will be some, perhaps a lot of variation. Having so many expamples will help to determine the acceptable ranges for tolerances. Thank you all for offering. This project seems to have hit close the hearts of a lot of you. My mailbox is filled with tips and comments from well wishers and those wanting to help. There are apparently a lot of people who read the forum but don't post.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

Francesco,
My 4005WB has the thinnest neck of all my Ricks, and is a joy to play, although my favorite is my '73 4001 which is only slightly thicker. Speaking of martians, I knew one back when I was living in Los Angeles in the '80s. His name was Ray Walston. Very nice guy. RIP Ray!
User avatar
rickinroma
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1109
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Post by rickinroma »

OH, Andrew, really that '68 4005 went to Italy??? I must find it then!! And yes, thin necks were common on sixties ricks but it wasn't a rule at ric factory since several ricks from the 60s have thick neck... Lead guitarist in my band has a aug68 345 w/thick neck...only a few months after my 67 4005 and 360... and my late 66 330 has thick neck also.. so maybe there wasn't a starting/final point
Anyway it's really too bad that RIC discontinued producing thin necks since everybody here seems to love it much more than the "regular" one...
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

The neck on my '63 4001 is so thin it is frightening. It is a wonder it was never broken.
User avatar
rickinroma
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1109
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Post by rickinroma »

maybe they discontinued thin necks because they were weak..even if i have never heard of broken ones..well except Pete Townshend, but it's another story :-)
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

http://www.hendrixguitars.com/Ba777.htm
Here it is Francesco..ever go to Genova?
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Post by wints »

User avatar
rickinroma
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1109
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Post by rickinroma »

Thanks Andrew...just finished talking on the phone with them...they just put this bass in their collection gallery..so they dont sell it..nice try
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

So, time for some pics. I have to warn you. They are a bit gruesome. The fingerboard is off and there is something of a mess underneath. Not unworkable but daunting nonetheless. The project here is to restore the original truss channels and fill the new one.

Image

Here is the head end of the neck. There is a lot of wood missing from the center area. Some if it stuck to the fingerboard but most was simply left out. This is not as bad as it looks. The single truss rod can be seen on the left side of the picture.

Image

Here is the body end. The round thing is the truss anchor. This is the thing that makes replacing a Gibson style rod next to impossible without major surgery. Rickenbacker rods can be normally be removed and installed without opening any laminations.

Image
User avatar
kennyhowes
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5022
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
Contact:

Post by kennyhowes »

gruesome indeed...
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

Ted, are you going to install old-style expansion rods or post-84 compression rods?
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

OPEN NECK SURGERY!!! I puked when I saw the pics!
User avatar
jaymi
Advanced Member
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by jaymi »

Sometimes to be redeemed, surgery is the only way.
78 Purple 4001
88 BLACKSTAR
89 BLACKSTAR
89 Mid Blue
91 Mid Blue
User avatar
beatlefan
Senior Member
Posts: 4345
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 4:13 pm

Post by beatlefan »

Does the 4005 take a special set of rods due to the increased neck length? The neck appears to be a good bit longer than the 4001/4003....
1973 4001 MG cb fwi
1986 4003 Shadow
2012 4004Cii FG w/gold trim
rickfan60
Senior Member
Posts: 5395
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:00 am

Post by rickfan60 »

This bass will get a set of the old style rods. The 4005 has the same scale as the 4001 so the neck length is about the same. The overall length of a 4005 is greater but that has more to do with the body than the neck.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”