4005 Project
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
David and Jerry thank you. I will be asking both of you and Jeff Scott for a lot of details as I work through the planning. Seeing as they are handmade there will be some, perhaps a lot of variation. Having so many expamples will help to determine the acceptable ranges for tolerances. Thank you all for offering. This project seems to have hit close the hearts of a lot of you. My mailbox is filled with tips and comments from well wishers and those wanting to help. There are apparently a lot of people who read the forum but don't post.
- rickinroma
- RRF Consultant
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:27 pm
- Contact:
OH, Andrew, really that '68 4005 went to Italy??? I must find it then!! And yes, thin necks were common on sixties ricks but it wasn't a rule at ric factory since several ricks from the 60s have thick neck... Lead guitarist in my band has a aug68 345 w/thick neck...only a few months after my 67 4005 and 360... and my late 66 330 has thick neck also.. so maybe there wasn't a starting/final point
Anyway it's really too bad that RIC discontinued producing thin necks since everybody here seems to love it much more than the "regular" one...
Anyway it's really too bad that RIC discontinued producing thin necks since everybody here seems to love it much more than the "regular" one...
- rickinroma
- RRF Consultant
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:27 pm
- Contact:
http://www.hendrixguitars.com/Ba777.htm
Here it is Francesco..ever go to Genova?
Here it is Francesco..ever go to Genova?
http://www.hendrixguitars.com/HxCollezione.htm
Phone number here....
Phone number here....
- rickinroma
- RRF Consultant
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:27 pm
- Contact:
So, time for some pics. I have to warn you. They are a bit gruesome. The fingerboard is off and there is something of a mess underneath. Not unworkable but daunting nonetheless. The project here is to restore the original truss channels and fill the new one.
Here is the head end of the neck. There is a lot of wood missing from the center area. Some if it stuck to the fingerboard but most was simply left out. This is not as bad as it looks. The single truss rod can be seen on the left side of the picture.
Here is the body end. The round thing is the truss anchor. This is the thing that makes replacing a Gibson style rod next to impossible without major surgery. Rickenbacker rods can be normally be removed and installed without opening any laminations.

Here is the head end of the neck. There is a lot of wood missing from the center area. Some if it stuck to the fingerboard but most was simply left out. This is not as bad as it looks. The single truss rod can be seen on the left side of the picture.
Here is the body end. The round thing is the truss anchor. This is the thing that makes replacing a Gibson style rod next to impossible without major surgery. Rickenbacker rods can be normally be removed and installed without opening any laminations.

- kennyhowes
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 5022
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
- Contact:
