checker binding years

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: checker binding years

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

so, late '72/early '73 for whitey !
randym
New member
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:01 am

Re: checker binding years

Post by randym »

BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:so, late '72/early '73 for whitey !
Not as good as I once thought, but cha' can't win em all. I'll get it restrung and set up. I haven't played it in years and suddenly have the urge to do that!
User avatar
Danotron
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1423
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:07 pm

Re: checker binding years

Post by Danotron »

randym wrote:
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:so, late '72/early '73 for whitey !
Not as good as I once thought, but cha' can't win em all. I'll get it restrung and set up. I haven't played it in years and suddenly have the urge to do that!
Don't kid yourself, those are great years for Rick Basses 8)
randym
New member
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:01 am

Re: checker binding years

Post by randym »

Danotron wrote:
randym wrote:
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:so, late '72/early '73 for whitey !
Not as good as I once thought, but cha' can't win em all. I'll get it restrung and set up. I haven't played it in years and suddenly have the urge to do that!
Don't kid yourself, those are great years for Rick Basses 8)
I agree, but a 1969 would have been better than 72-73. I have several people at work telling me to sell the 64, and I'm considering it, but I'll keep the other no matter what.
randym
New member
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:01 am

Re: checker binding years

Post by randym »

Look what I found!

Image
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: checker binding years

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

that's one ugly coil ! any life in the coil as far as resistance ? might be able to wire brush the screws. don't attempt to remove them...probably break the winding if it still works. if it's dead...send it off to sergio.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: checker binding years

Post by sloop_john_b »

Nice!!
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Re: checker binding years

Post by wints »

Cool Randy. It's great when you see an original bobbin still with these 60's basses. They are very scarce.

What Ron said...

Be very careful with the polepieces if you attempt to clean them. Put a meter on the leads and see if there's a resistance. Even in that condition the windings might be sound. They actually don't look too bad...
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Re: checker binding years

Post by leftybass »

Cool, I can't wait to see it all back together.

Randy, you didn't happen to find two of them, did you..?? LOL :mrgreen:
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: checker binding years

Post by jps »

leftybass wrote:Cool, I can't wait to see it all back together.

Randy, you didn't happen to find two of them, did you..?? LOL :mrgreen:
Yeah, John, and Randy was kind enough to send the two others to me! :mrgreen:
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: checker binding years

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

so these were dished on the top ? bottom side too ???
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Re: checker binding years

Post by wints »

BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:so these were dished on the top ? bottom side too ???
Yup...top and bottom lip.
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: checker binding years

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

no wonder the coil forms are so brittle.
randym
New member
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 8:01 am

Re: checker binding years

Post by randym »

Well, it was a busy weekend going through years of junk in the garage. I had a little time and I can't get an resistance on the coil from the 64, but I didn't have too much time to spend on it. The lead connected to the coil wire was broke off. I tried to solder it back on, but may not have got enough enamel off of the wire for it to make a good connection. The next two weeks are going to suck at work, so it may be a little while before I can get back to it. It's waited this long, a few more weeks won't make a difference.

Now for the good news. I found this!

Image

The rear pickup from the white bass. I had no idea I kept it, but I guess that's one of the good things about being a pack-rat. :mrgreen:

the bad news is it doesn't have any resistance on it either.
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: checker binding years

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

broken leads are common, especially when removing the pickup. possibly broken off at the end of the coil wires where it meets the harness. that would be good news. any further in ...bad news. although i got lucky unwinding an '81 coil about 20 turns to get continuity.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”