Hopefully this one won't go over $450.00; that's about the break-even on it.Ontario_RIC_fan wrote:There are lots of good deals right now!jingle_jangle wrote:That thing's pure project GOLD!
This one went for $895!
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1970s-Rickenbac ... 7675.l2557
One sad sight on the Bay
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: One sad sight on the Bay
- watton_earth
- New member
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 4:43 pm
Re: One sad sight on the Bay
I want to be a door too...
Re: One sad sight on the Bay
That wasn't as good of a deal as you may think Brian. The original ROS jack is gone ($110.00 to replace), and it's got an AllParts tailpiece on it ($125.00 to replace). It also has HipShot Tuners on it, which are better, but may turn some people off.
Re: One sad sight on the Bay
I don't think anyone buying that bass is concerned with how original it is. There's no point in replacing the ROS jack, because the serial number wouldn't match and it has a plain metal plate already on it. Some people consider the Allparts tailpiece and Hipshot tuners an improvement over the stock units as well. I think it was a fantastic deal for someone who wanted a Rick bass and wasen't concerned with its aesthetics.aceonbass wrote:That wasn't as good of a deal as you may think Brian. The original ROS jack is gone ($110.00 to replace), and it's got an AllParts tailpiece on it ($125.00 to replace). It also has HipShot Tuners on it, which are better, but may turn some people off.
Re: One sad sight on the Bay
Given the fact that the AllParts tailpiece is pretty much the same as the stock piece aesthetically and functionally (John Hall has commented that the casting was actually based on RIC's casting....lawsuit pending), I don't know how anyone can say it functions any better. The AllParts one definitely has poorer quality plating, and is a lot cheaper. But yes, I'm sure someone felt it was a real steal of a deal.
Re: One sad sight on the Bay
ilan wrote:A new kind of tail lift!
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: One sad sight on the Bay
40 minutes to go and it's up to $800. Could this be a bid from a lunatic asylum?
Paying that much is crazy, IMO. That's roughly twice what it's worth in anyone's wildest imaginings.
Paying that much is crazy, IMO. That's roughly twice what it's worth in anyone's wildest imaginings.
- electrofaro
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3611
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm
Re: One sad sight on the Bay
An asylum with money then 
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
Re: One sad sight on the Bay
Not if the person buying it is the person fixing it, which isn't really that hard if you know how to use an iron, a wet rag, wood clamps and glue.Electrostring wrote:An asylum with money then
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: One sad sight on the Bay
That easy, huh?

Re: One sad sight on the Bay
You know what I mean Paul, and it ain't rocket science.
- RickyBubba
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 657
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 11:58 am
Re: One sad sight on the Bay
Went for more than I would have thought!
- DriftSpace
- Member
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 10:07 pm
- Contact:
Re: One sad sight on the Bay
That's only $15 less (shipping included) than I spent for my 1990 White BHBT earlier this year; it just had some minor tail lift and was dirty, but was otherwise perfectly playable. I agree that $835 for this is kind of nuts; I only paid $600 for first JetGlo 4003, which had no functional problems at all.
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: One sad sight on the Bay
OK, I'm game--what's the wet rag for? To clean one's brow?aceonbass wrote:You know what I mean Paul, and it ain't rocket science.
Re: One sad sight on the Bay
Very dubious bidding patterns.
