Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by JakeK »

Restrung my pride and joy earlier this evening. Had to wait until Mike & Molly was over, but here we go. These pictures show the fireglo pattern is closer to Mark's '86, which is from the same batch as mine and Tom Petty's.

Your thoughts, Eddie?
Attachments
100_1250.jpg
100_1254.jpg
100_1255.jpg
100_1258.jpg
Last edited by JakeK on Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by JakeK »

Here's a shot of the bridge...the action is like butter. Since it left Ron, I've never had the neck adjusted, and Steve says it's as straight as an arrow and doesn't need an adjustment.
Attachments
100_1274.jpg
Last edited by JakeK on Mon Feb 04, 2013 11:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jwilli
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4327
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2000 8:45 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by jwilli »

Eddie, I believe that a small number of early '64 Rose Morris instruments had the square heels. I do think the bound f-hole is factory.
k43rover wrote:
jwilli wrote:
k43rover wrote: This is really special...an antecedent of the New Style f-holes they shipped in small volumes to Italy at the end of the '60's.
Yes but the body shape is quite bit different from what would be known as the New Style. Square neck heel, more of a hand shaped body style, solid white binding on the back.
That's a very interesting spec for '64. I believe all the '64 Rose Morris exports, even the first shipment, had the rounded heel so this square heel must be rare (unique?) on any '64 f-hole guitar. In the picture it looks like the f-hole is bound as well...do you think that's factory original?
Clifton
Junior Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:54 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by Clifton »

sloop_john_b wrote:
Clifton wrote: Yes, don't forget the basses! (BTW--wasn't the 4005 exported? But I can't recall the RM number for it.)
3261

Image
That looks fantastic with the f-hole.

What happened to the you tube videos?
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by kiramdear »

Great stuff there, Jake. Love the color on that one. 8) It's robust without being clownish, with just the right amount of amber.
All I wanna do is rock!
User avatar
k43rover
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:07 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by k43rover »

JakeK wrote:Restrung my pride and joy earlier this evening. Had to wait until Mike & Molly was over, but here we go. These pictures show the fireglo pattern is closer to Mark's '86, which is from the same batch as mine and Tom Petty's.

Your thoughts, Eddie?

Looks excellent Jake. It's good that you've got one with a straight and true neck too! :D

Now you've gotta cross your fingers that the factory does a C series anniversary reissue of this model 1997 next year. Once you sample a brand spanking new reissue with the X-braced body and the same beautiful cosmetics as your existing guitar I think you'll find it very difficult to to resist the upgrade (start saving now!) 8) It'll be interesting to see whether they go with the true-to-the-original-but-somewhat-unloved Accents on a reissue, or play safe with a trapeze/R...either way, I think they'll be queuing round the block for 'em! :D
Last edited by k43rover on Tue Feb 05, 2013 3:35 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
k43rover
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:07 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by k43rover »

jwilli wrote:Eddie, I believe that a small number of early '64 Rose Morris instruments had the square heels. I do think the bound f-hole is factory.

That's interesting - I don't recall seeing any pics of full bodied export models (1997, 1998, 1993) with a square heel but I do recall reading that they used NOS older bodies (with square heels?) for some early shipments of the model 1996. I think the bound f-hole looks good...I wonder why the factory decided to ditch that feature on the standard series production deluxe/bound body guitars. I recall Collin's old modded 1993 also had the f-hole bound when he first got it from Canada and I thought that looked great too..
User avatar
k43rover
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:07 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by k43rover »

Clifton wrote:
k43rover wrote:
JakeK wrote:Some more from this Petty fellow...

...and yet more...this Petty fellow has spectacularly good taste! 8)

It's easy to have good taste when Rickenbacker builds you custom guitars, like his recent 1993/12 and his double-bound 1998!
The attachment image.jpg is no longer available

That's right! Here's another pic of the same two beauties :D
Attachments
Petty f holes April 2012.jpg
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by godber »

Great pictures everyone, some fantastic examples on display. Lovin it. :D
User avatar
k43rover
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:07 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by k43rover »

JakeK wrote: I believe our admin Peter has a special 12-string in Rose Morris specs that was custom made for him in 2003. Whether he wants to contribute, tell us the story and share some pics or not is up to him.
He's already done that Jake...and on this very website! That one is indeed a rare beauty.

Full story/pics here:

http://www.rickresource.com/rrp/1993SPC.html
Attachments
One off 1993 SPC.jpg
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by electrofaro »

k43rover wrote:That's right! Here's another pic of the same two beauties :D
Are the selector switch tips so long and narrow, or is it just the picture?

That 2 PU is almost perfect - adding a 660 wide 24 fret neck and bound slash hole would do :wink:
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
k43rover
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:07 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by k43rover »

Electrostring wrote: adding a 660 wide 24 fret neck and bound slash hole would do :wink:
Would be good if the factory offered the bound sound hole as an ex-works cost option. I'm sure a lot of people would go for it (either on the f or slash!) and it could be priced at a level which would make it a nice little earner even taking account of the small degree of added production complexity.
Last edited by k43rover on Tue Feb 05, 2013 7:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
k43rover
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:07 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by k43rover »

Electrostring wrote: Are the selector switch tips so long and narrow, or is it just the picture?
mmmm...they do look a little longer than usual...could just be camera angle or maybe Tom is getting yet more special order features from the factory...
Attachments
Is my tip long enough.JPG
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by electrofaro »

Special feature mini-joystick selector switch tips :lol:
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
fireglo67

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by fireglo67 »

A friends '67 1998.
Attachments
photo (1).JPG
photo.JPG
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”