That one on the left be a 1993!
Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery
Looking good, Dan
That one on the left be a 1993!
That one on the left be a 1993!
Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery
Noted and edited 
Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery
Very Nice Dan
Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery
Sweet guitars Dan.
There's a lot of love for the Rose Morris series here, so please post your pics.
There's a lot of love for the Rose Morris series here, so please post your pics.
- frickengruvin
- Junior Member
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:34 pm
Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery
Here's a group shot of mine with some other guitars I own...My RM is a single family guitar. My cousin bought it new in '64, and I inherited it along with his Rickenbacker b16 combo amp...


Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery
Very cool that it's stayed on your family for all those years.Congrats 
- 8mileshigher
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4886
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:34 pm
Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery
+1scotty wrote:Very Nice Dan
Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery
Thanks Guys!
Interesting changes going on in the collection these days..(that's all I have to say about that)
Interesting changes going on in the collection these days..(that's all I have to say about that)
Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery
Eddie, you are correct. I had thought that a '64 1997 DA 17 had the square neck heel. I went back and checked my pics. It was a regular rounded heel.k43rover wrote:jwilli wrote:Eddie, I believe that a small number of early '64 Rose Morris instruments had the square heels. I do think the bound f-hole is factory.
That's interesting - I don't recall seeing any pics of full bodied export models (1997, 1998, 1993) with a square heel but I do recall reading that they used NOS older bodies (with square heels?) for some early shipments of the model 1996. I think the bound f-hole looks good...I wonder why the factory decided to ditch that feature on the standard series production deluxe/bound body guitars. I recall Collin's old modded 1993 also had the f-hole bound when he first got it from Canada and I thought that looked great too..
My mind is going.......
Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery
Old is not necessarily best!
Here's my 2008 re-issue Rose Morris model 1996 in Amber Fireglo - one of the last batch of about 30 1996s which were manufactured in 2008 and generally accepted as being amongst the best of this run. Still in mint, factory-condition.
Here's my 2008 re-issue Rose Morris model 1996 in Amber Fireglo - one of the last batch of about 30 1996s which were manufactured in 2008 and generally accepted as being amongst the best of this run. Still in mint, factory-condition.
Santa visits only once a year, but Santa Ana delivers Rics all year round.
Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery
Wow! Gorgeous flame.johna wrote:Here is my 64 RM1999.
Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery
I thought there were some early full scale Rose Morris models with square heels too, but looks like they were all rounded. There were certainly square heels on full scale models in '63, so it must have been another changeover feature of the era.
The first 1996's did come with square heels, and a few of them even had no neck volute. The idea that the first 1996's were made with NOS bodies was unsubstantiated folklore. Originally it was an attempt to explain the appearance of 1996's with 2 o'clock soundholes, and perhaps tie these ones to the '58-'60 models. There were also claims that only approx 20 '64 models were made with 2 o'oclock soundhole. Such turned out to be untrue as more data came to light. It turned out that at least half of the 200 1996's made in '64 had 2 o'clock soundholes. The heel is on the neck, not the body, and the super slim neck and headstock was certainly a '64 implimentation. I guess they were still playing around with the 1996 neck design on the first batch or two.
The first 1996's did come with square heels, and a few of them even had no neck volute. The idea that the first 1996's were made with NOS bodies was unsubstantiated folklore. Originally it was an attempt to explain the appearance of 1996's with 2 o'clock soundholes, and perhaps tie these ones to the '58-'60 models. There were also claims that only approx 20 '64 models were made with 2 o'oclock soundhole. Such turned out to be untrue as more data came to light. It turned out that at least half of the 200 1996's made in '64 had 2 o'clock soundholes. The heel is on the neck, not the body, and the super slim neck and headstock was certainly a '64 implimentation. I guess they were still playing around with the 1996 neck design on the first batch or two.
Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery
I could swear that I've seen some very early '64 1997 models with a square heel, maybe only once.
From what I gather, they changed to the round heels sometime in Feb or March '64, maybe?
There are a handful of 360S/12 models made with square neck heels including JWilli's paddle-headstock and Townshend's first 360S/12....both of which are early '64 but not quite Rose Morris models.
From what I gather, they changed to the round heels sometime in Feb or March '64, maybe?
There are a handful of 360S/12 models made with square neck heels including JWilli's paddle-headstock and Townshend's first 360S/12....both of which are early '64 but not quite Rose Morris models.
Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery
frickengruvin wrote:Here's a group shot of mine with some other guitars I own...My RM is a single family guitar. My cousin bought it new in '64, and I inherited it along with his Rickenbacker b16 combo amp...
Wow, you could get just about any guitar tone ever needed from this collection! Very nice!
