Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6992
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by collin »

Looking good, Dan

That one on the left be a 1993! 8)
User avatar
Danotron
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1423
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:07 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by Danotron »

Noted and edited :oops:
User avatar
scotty
Senior Member
Posts: 7097
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:27 am

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by scotty »

Very Nice Dan
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by godber »

Sweet guitars Dan.

There's a lot of love for the Rose Morris series here, so please post your pics. :D
User avatar
frickengruvin
Junior Member
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:34 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by frickengruvin »

Here's a group shot of mine with some other guitars I own...My RM is a single family guitar. My cousin bought it new in '64, and I inherited it along with his Rickenbacker b16 combo amp...






Image
User avatar
scotty
Senior Member
Posts: 7097
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:27 am

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by scotty »

Very cool that it's stayed on your family for all those years.Congrats :D
User avatar
8mileshigher
Senior Member
Posts: 4886
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:34 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by 8mileshigher »

scotty wrote:Very Nice Dan
+1
User avatar
Danotron
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1423
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:07 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by Danotron »

Thanks Guys!

Interesting changes going on in the collection these days..(that's all I have to say about that) 8)
User avatar
jwilli
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4327
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2000 8:45 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by jwilli »

k43rover wrote:
jwilli wrote:Eddie, I believe that a small number of early '64 Rose Morris instruments had the square heels. I do think the bound f-hole is factory.

That's interesting - I don't recall seeing any pics of full bodied export models (1997, 1998, 1993) with a square heel but I do recall reading that they used NOS older bodies (with square heels?) for some early shipments of the model 1996. I think the bound f-hole looks good...I wonder why the factory decided to ditch that feature on the standard series production deluxe/bound body guitars. I recall Collin's old modded 1993 also had the f-hole bound when he first got it from Canada and I thought that looked great too..
Eddie, you are correct. I had thought that a '64 1997 DA 17 had the square neck heel. I went back and checked my pics. It was a regular rounded heel.

My mind is going....... :roll:
User avatar
redamber
Member
Posts: 345
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 1:34 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by redamber »

Old is not necessarily best!

Here's my 2008 re-issue Rose Morris model 1996 in Amber Fireglo - one of the last batch of about 30 1996s which were manufactured in 2008 and generally accepted as being amongst the best of this run. Still in mint, factory-condition.
325 1996 resze.JPG
Santa visits only once a year, but Santa Ana delivers Rics all year round.
johna
New member
Posts: 85
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2011 9:44 am

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by johna »

Here is my 64 RM1999.
Attachments
DK571 front view - Ricresource.jpg
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by godber »

johna wrote:Here is my 64 RM1999.
Wow! Gorgeous flame.
User avatar
glen_l
Member
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2000 3:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by glen_l »

I thought there were some early full scale Rose Morris models with square heels too, but looks like they were all rounded. There were certainly square heels on full scale models in '63, so it must have been another changeover feature of the era.

The first 1996's did come with square heels, and a few of them even had no neck volute. The idea that the first 1996's were made with NOS bodies was unsubstantiated folklore. Originally it was an attempt to explain the appearance of 1996's with 2 o'clock soundholes, and perhaps tie these ones to the '58-'60 models. There were also claims that only approx 20 '64 models were made with 2 o'oclock soundhole. Such turned out to be untrue as more data came to light. It turned out that at least half of the 200 1996's made in '64 had 2 o'clock soundholes. The heel is on the neck, not the body, and the super slim neck and headstock was certainly a '64 implimentation. I guess they were still playing around with the 1996 neck design on the first batch or two.
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6992
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by collin »

I could swear that I've seen some very early '64 1997 models with a square heel, maybe only once.

From what I gather, they changed to the round heels sometime in Feb or March '64, maybe?

There are a handful of 360S/12 models made with square neck heels including JWilli's paddle-headstock and Townshend's first 360S/12....both of which are early '64 but not quite Rose Morris models.
Clifton
Junior Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:54 pm

Re: Rose Morris Rickenbacker Gallery

Post by Clifton »

frickengruvin wrote:Here's a group shot of mine with some other guitars I own...My RM is a single family guitar. My cousin bought it new in '64, and I inherited it along with his Rickenbacker b16 combo amp...






Image

Wow, you could get just about any guitar tone ever needed from this collection! Very nice!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”