Lollar lawsuit

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Post by cassius987 »

sloop_john_b wrote:
cassius987 wrote:
jdogric12 wrote:In general, over the last 10-15 years, I have directly heard more negative things regarding Rickenbacker than straight-up praise.
At gigs? I only ever get praise for them at a show.
They're talking about the guitars -- big difference there.
Really? PM me if you want to explain--I don't get it.
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Post by jdogric12 »

cassius987 wrote:
jdogric12 wrote:In general, over the last 10-15 years, I have directly heard more negative things regarding Rickenbacker than straight-up praise.
At gigs? I only ever get praise for them at a show.
Both guitars and bass. 50% is praise, and the other 50% start out with something guarded like "nice Rick" and then proceed to go into their bad experiences and why they hate the company, instruments or certain characters involved who need not be named.
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Post by deaconblues »

jdogric12 wrote: Both guitars and bass. 50% is praise, and the other 50% start out with something guarded like "nice Rick" and then proceed to go into their bad experiences and why they hate the company, instruments or certain characters involved who need not be named.
Yep. Unfortunately music store employees/owners seem to often have a few negative stories from dealing with the company.
User avatar
iiipopes
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1479
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:02 pm

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Post by iiipopes »

deaconblues wrote:Yep. Unfortunately music store employees/owners seem to often have a few negative stories from dealing with the company.
That's because RIC doesn't put up with their %^!!$#!+, so they badmouth instead of doing their job properly as a retailer.
User avatar
Grey
Advanced Member
Posts: 1659
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:10 pm

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Post by Grey »

iiipopes wrote:That's because RIC doesn't put up with their %^!!$#!+, so they badmouth instead of doing their job properly as a retailer.
Or they just had a bad experience with the company. Nothing nefarious about it.
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Post by jdogric12 »

In some cases, sure, but I've heard stuff from very well-respected people (some of the rare honest ones!) that have been dealing in vintage guitars since they were just "old" guitars.
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Post by deaconblues »

iiipopes wrote:
deaconblues wrote:Yep. Unfortunately music store employees/owners seem to often have a few negative stories from dealing with the company.
That's because RIC doesn't put up with their %^!!$#!+, so they badmouth instead of doing their job properly as a retailer.
Some of them, maybe. But are all of them in the wrong? Unlikely.

At some point you've just got to take a step back and look at the other side of the issue. Yes, Rickenbacker has a bad reputation among many for aggressive legal action and just being harder than other companies to deal with in general. Yes, it hurts the brand.

Whether it's worth the effort is where opinion comes in.
User avatar
antipodean
Senior Member
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:27 am

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Post by antipodean »

deaconblues wrote:Yes, Rickenbacker has a bad reputation among many for aggressive legal action and just being harder than other companies to deal with in general.
I can understand that the latter issue, "being hard to deal with", could be big a problem (though I have never experienced this, so I can't comment on the validity of the claim), but the "aggressive legal action" that is referred to only affects people who are infringing upon RIC's IP. You have to have an "ownership is theft" mentality to be upset about someone protecting their IP (or not understand the concept). If it comes down to some concept of "virtue" that is not related directly to satisfaction with the product and after-sales support, I would have thought that RIC's conduct is way up towards the "righteous" end of the scale relative to the competition.... :?
"I don't want to sound incredulous but I can't believe it" Rex Mossop
User avatar
badeggs
Intermediate Member
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:04 am

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Post by badeggs »

jdogric12 wrote:Both guitars and bass. 50% is praise, and the other 50% start out with something guarded like "nice Rick" and then proceed to go into their bad experiences and why they hate the company, instruments or certain characters involved who need not be named.
Never experienced this myself. Talking bass here, but I've only ever gotten the "oh man I wish I had one of those!"-type compliments for a 4001 at a gig.
User avatar
iiipopes
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1479
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:02 pm

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Post by iiipopes »

When Cassius987 got one of his basses, I set it up for him. He took it to a local music store to shop strings. After some leeryness of the staff, they finally played it. They said it was the best bass setup they had ever played. When he told me, I told him not to tell who set it up, because the staff luthier at that same store does my fretwork, including on my Ricks, and he is a great Rick luthier.
egosheep
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:29 pm
Contact:

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Post by egosheep »

To expand on some previous comments about the cost of making these: the pickups are a serious labor of love. The process of making them makes my head spin... starting off with raw bar stock and cutting it, heating it, bending it(on a custom jig), sanding out the warps, trimming it, tapping it, sanding again, buffing it... then shipping it off to be treated/hardened, then somewhere else to be plated, then somewhere to be magnetized? It's a logistical nightmare and there's way too many processes involved for it to be some huge money boon. Jason has a passion for pickups and he likes a challenge, clearly. Compare this to making most other pickups, they are just magnets and wire. Getting magnetized chrome horseshoes(however "inaccurate" they may be) is a whole journey in itself before any pickup even gets wound.
Great Ramp In My Opinion.
Colonel Sanders
Intermediate Member
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:39 am

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Post by Colonel Sanders »

egosheep wrote:To expand on some previous comments about the cost of making these: the pickups are a serious labor of love. The process of making them makes my head spin... starting off with raw bar stock and cutting it, heating it, bending it(on a custom jig), sanding out the warps, trimming it, tapping it, sanding again, buffing it... then shipping it off to be treated/hardened, then somewhere else to be plated, then somewhere to be magnetized? It's a logistical nightmare and there's way too many processes involved for it to be some huge money boon. Jason has a passion for pickups and he likes a challenge, clearly. Compare this to making most other pickups, they are just magnets and wire. Getting magnetized chrome horseshoes(however "inaccurate" they may be) is a whole journey in itself before any pickup even gets wound.
Pretty much my gutfeel too.

A labour of "love". Not done for the profitability of the exercise.
1973 4001 Jetglo
2017 4003S Jetglo
2023 4003 Mapleglo
2022 4005XC Jetglo
1979 MusicMan Stingray
2021 Epiphone Thunderbird
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Post by aceonbass »

Mr.Lollar is in business to make money, no matter how much he loves making puckups. The materials in his HS pickups do not cost $430.00. His profit is his labor, which is probably half of that. He's not going to court for a labor of love. He's going to court for money.
User avatar
soundmasterg
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1923
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 1:06 pm

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Post by soundmasterg »

aceonbass wrote:He's not going to court for a labor of love. He's going to court for money.
As is Rickenbacker.

Lollar might also be going to court for the precedent this case would set....in that someone is apparently attempting to trademark something that was formerly patented, and also is being trademarked based on a functional aspect of the design.

That said, these pickups are probably the most expensive to produce among any somewhat common pickup design out there....

Greg
Colonel Sanders
Intermediate Member
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:39 am

Re: Lollar lawsuit

Post by Colonel Sanders »

aceonbass wrote:Mr.Lollar is in business to make money, no matter how much he loves making puckups. The materials in his HS pickups do not cost $430.00. His profit is his labor, which is probably half of that. He's not going to court for a labor of love. He's going to court for money.
Even if he is making $200 per HS, it is still pocket change considering the trouble and the ridiculously minuscule market for this pickup. I would be surprised if he would he sells 100 HS over the next 10 years. A staggering profit of around $20K if my assumptions are right.
1973 4001 Jetglo
2017 4003S Jetglo
2023 4003 Mapleglo
2022 4005XC Jetglo
1979 MusicMan Stingray
2021 Epiphone Thunderbird
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”