Really? PM me if you want to explain--I don't get it.sloop_john_b wrote:They're talking about the guitars -- big difference there.cassius987 wrote:At gigs? I only ever get praise for them at a show.jdogric12 wrote:In general, over the last 10-15 years, I have directly heard more negative things regarding Rickenbacker than straight-up praise.
Lollar lawsuit
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
- cassius987
- Senior Member
- Posts: 4723
- Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: Lollar lawsuit
Re: Lollar lawsuit
Both guitars and bass. 50% is praise, and the other 50% start out with something guarded like "nice Rick" and then proceed to go into their bad experiences and why they hate the company, instruments or certain characters involved who need not be named.cassius987 wrote:At gigs? I only ever get praise for them at a show.jdogric12 wrote:In general, over the last 10-15 years, I have directly heard more negative things regarding Rickenbacker than straight-up praise.
- deaconblues
- RRF Consultant
- Posts: 2390
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm
Re: Lollar lawsuit
Yep. Unfortunately music store employees/owners seem to often have a few negative stories from dealing with the company.jdogric12 wrote: Both guitars and bass. 50% is praise, and the other 50% start out with something guarded like "nice Rick" and then proceed to go into their bad experiences and why they hate the company, instruments or certain characters involved who need not be named.
Re: Lollar lawsuit
That's because RIC doesn't put up with their %^!!$#!+, so they badmouth instead of doing their job properly as a retailer.deaconblues wrote:Yep. Unfortunately music store employees/owners seem to often have a few negative stories from dealing with the company.
Re: Lollar lawsuit
Or they just had a bad experience with the company. Nothing nefarious about it.iiipopes wrote:That's because RIC doesn't put up with their %^!!$#!+, so they badmouth instead of doing their job properly as a retailer.
Re: Lollar lawsuit
In some cases, sure, but I've heard stuff from very well-respected people (some of the rare honest ones!) that have been dealing in vintage guitars since they were just "old" guitars.
- deaconblues
- RRF Consultant
- Posts: 2390
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm
Re: Lollar lawsuit
Some of them, maybe. But are all of them in the wrong? Unlikely.iiipopes wrote:That's because RIC doesn't put up with their %^!!$#!+, so they badmouth instead of doing their job properly as a retailer.deaconblues wrote:Yep. Unfortunately music store employees/owners seem to often have a few negative stories from dealing with the company.
At some point you've just got to take a step back and look at the other side of the issue. Yes, Rickenbacker has a bad reputation among many for aggressive legal action and just being harder than other companies to deal with in general. Yes, it hurts the brand.
Whether it's worth the effort is where opinion comes in.
- antipodean
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3182
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:27 am
Re: Lollar lawsuit
I can understand that the latter issue, "being hard to deal with", could be big a problem (though I have never experienced this, so I can't comment on the validity of the claim), but the "aggressive legal action" that is referred to only affects people who are infringing upon RIC's IP. You have to have an "ownership is theft" mentality to be upset about someone protecting their IP (or not understand the concept). If it comes down to some concept of "virtue" that is not related directly to satisfaction with the product and after-sales support, I would have thought that RIC's conduct is way up towards the "righteous" end of the scale relative to the competition....deaconblues wrote:Yes, Rickenbacker has a bad reputation among many for aggressive legal action and just being harder than other companies to deal with in general.
"I don't want to sound incredulous but I can't believe it" Rex Mossop
Re: Lollar lawsuit
Never experienced this myself. Talking bass here, but I've only ever gotten the "oh man I wish I had one of those!"-type compliments for a 4001 at a gig.jdogric12 wrote:Both guitars and bass. 50% is praise, and the other 50% start out with something guarded like "nice Rick" and then proceed to go into their bad experiences and why they hate the company, instruments or certain characters involved who need not be named.
Re: Lollar lawsuit
When Cassius987 got one of his basses, I set it up for him. He took it to a local music store to shop strings. After some leeryness of the staff, they finally played it. They said it was the best bass setup they had ever played. When he told me, I told him not to tell who set it up, because the staff luthier at that same store does my fretwork, including on my Ricks, and he is a great Rick luthier.
Re: Lollar lawsuit
To expand on some previous comments about the cost of making these: the pickups are a serious labor of love. The process of making them makes my head spin... starting off with raw bar stock and cutting it, heating it, bending it(on a custom jig), sanding out the warps, trimming it, tapping it, sanding again, buffing it... then shipping it off to be treated/hardened, then somewhere else to be plated, then somewhere to be magnetized? It's a logistical nightmare and there's way too many processes involved for it to be some huge money boon. Jason has a passion for pickups and he likes a challenge, clearly. Compare this to making most other pickups, they are just magnets and wire. Getting magnetized chrome horseshoes(however "inaccurate" they may be) is a whole journey in itself before any pickup even gets wound.
Great Ramp In My Opinion.
-
Colonel Sanders
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 842
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:39 am
Re: Lollar lawsuit
Pretty much my gutfeel too.egosheep wrote:To expand on some previous comments about the cost of making these: the pickups are a serious labor of love. The process of making them makes my head spin... starting off with raw bar stock and cutting it, heating it, bending it(on a custom jig), sanding out the warps, trimming it, tapping it, sanding again, buffing it... then shipping it off to be treated/hardened, then somewhere else to be plated, then somewhere to be magnetized? It's a logistical nightmare and there's way too many processes involved for it to be some huge money boon. Jason has a passion for pickups and he likes a challenge, clearly. Compare this to making most other pickups, they are just magnets and wire. Getting magnetized chrome horseshoes(however "inaccurate" they may be) is a whole journey in itself before any pickup even gets wound.
A labour of "love". Not done for the profitability of the exercise.
1973 4001 Jetglo
2017 4003S Jetglo
2023 4003 Mapleglo
2022 4005XC Jetglo
1979 MusicMan Stingray
2021 Epiphone Thunderbird
2017 4003S Jetglo
2023 4003 Mapleglo
2022 4005XC Jetglo
1979 MusicMan Stingray
2021 Epiphone Thunderbird
Re: Lollar lawsuit
Mr.Lollar is in business to make money, no matter how much he loves making puckups. The materials in his HS pickups do not cost $430.00. His profit is his labor, which is probably half of that. He's not going to court for a labor of love. He's going to court for money.
- soundmasterg
- RRF Consultant
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 1:06 pm
Re: Lollar lawsuit
As is Rickenbacker.aceonbass wrote:He's not going to court for a labor of love. He's going to court for money.
Lollar might also be going to court for the precedent this case would set....in that someone is apparently attempting to trademark something that was formerly patented, and also is being trademarked based on a functional aspect of the design.
That said, these pickups are probably the most expensive to produce among any somewhat common pickup design out there....
Greg
-
Colonel Sanders
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 842
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:39 am
Re: Lollar lawsuit
Even if he is making $200 per HS, it is still pocket change considering the trouble and the ridiculously minuscule market for this pickup. I would be surprised if he would he sells 100 HS over the next 10 years. A staggering profit of around $20K if my assumptions are right.aceonbass wrote:Mr.Lollar is in business to make money, no matter how much he loves making puckups. The materials in his HS pickups do not cost $430.00. His profit is his labor, which is probably half of that. He's not going to court for a labor of love. He's going to court for money.
1973 4001 Jetglo
2017 4003S Jetglo
2023 4003 Mapleglo
2022 4005XC Jetglo
1979 MusicMan Stingray
2021 Epiphone Thunderbird
2017 4003S Jetglo
2023 4003 Mapleglo
2022 4005XC Jetglo
1979 MusicMan Stingray
2021 Epiphone Thunderbird
