1968 4001

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
gearhed289
Intermediate Member
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:51 am
Contact:

Re: 1968 4001

Post by gearhed289 »

sloop_john_b wrote:
johnhall wrote: I did some diving in the South China Sea there, between Kohamajima and Iriomote Island, and it was both interesting and frustrating to see so much fingerboard inlay material lying on the seafloor! Bu it's probably best that it stays there.
:lol:
No kidding! Us Ric folks do have twisted minds, don't we? :lol:
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Re: 1968 4001

Post by wints »

leftybass wrote:Interesting that it's a '68 and has Rick-O-Sound.
That was my first thought John. Earliest I have seen with ROS, and my Dec 68 is still mono. Great bass, possibly one of the Scott Jennings batch?

First thing to do is GET THOSE STRINGS OFF!
Get a light set of 40-95's on there and let that neck find out what it can do. Those strings look like cables! :roll:
Beautiful MG, with that wonderful aged Amberglo, all original, and certainly one of the best out there from an aesthetic standpoint.

10K? Unlikely, and probably not until that action has been sorted...
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 1968 4001

Post by sloop_john_b »

wints wrote:Great bass, possibly one of the Scott Jennings batch?
Yep, sounds like it.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: 1968 4001

Post by rickaddict »

johnhall wrote: Err, this is actually true.

Most of that shell material came from Kohamajima Island, Okinawa, which was turned into a protected marine reserve a number of years ago. A number of years ago I visited Ishigaki Island, which is the next island over from it in the Straits of Taiwan, to see if its abundant supplies of shell material could be utilized as a replacement but there were just too many hoops to jump through on that one.

I did some diving in the South China Sea there, between Kohamajima and Iriomote Island, and it was both interesting and frustrating to see so much fingerboard inlay material lying on the seafloor! Bu it's probably best that it stays there.
I wonder if sparkly inlay material could be reasonably faked using some sort of U.S. sourced abalone (not sure if that's even legally obtainable) or similar shell?

:?
User avatar
marc61
Senior Member
Posts: 6443
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 9:31 am
Contact:

Re: 1968 4001

Post by marc61 »

Much too high on the price. Sorry bu I gotta believe this bass doesn't play well with that action. Instruments need to be played, have adjustments made to over the years etc. Kinda like not hugging your child .
User avatar
FretlessOnly
Advanced Member
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 9:00 pm

Re: 1968 4001

Post by FretlessOnly »

You know, some of us love high action. But only if it's not an artifact of unadjustable neck bow.

Not willing to figure it out for that price.
Can we have everything louder than everything else?
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6261
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Re: 1968 4001

Post by cheyenne »

wints wrote: First thing to do is GET THOSE STRINGS OFF!
Get a light set of 40-95's on there and let that neck find out what it can do. Those strings look like cables! :roll:
+1 I'll bet that neck is just fine. It just needs some pro setup work.
"Knowledge is Power"
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: 1968 4001

Post by rickaddict »

wints wrote:
leftybass wrote:Interesting that it's a '68 and has Rick-O-Sound.
That was my first thought John. Earliest I have seen with ROS, and my Dec 68 is still mono. Great bass, possibly one of the Scott Jennings batch?
But this bass left the factory in the late 80's. Maybe it was completed using some current parts (wiring harness and retro-stamped jack plate).
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: 1968 4001

Post by johnallg »

The auction now says Maxima strings and also addresses the setup.

He also stated the horseshoe pickup is mounted offset and not correctly aligned over the E string. Look at the shoes and the more open gap is on the D and G side, not the E and A side. Current pickup coils have one pole pushed out further, and if the older coils are the same, as I suspect, then turning the whole treble pickup assembly 180 degrees would not only put the more open shoe over the E and A strings, but also align the poles of the coil on the strings correctly.
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Re: 1968 4001

Post by leftybass »

wints wrote:...That was my first thought John. Earliest I have seen with ROS, and my Dec 68 is still mono.
And my bass (April '69) is also mono.... this eBay '68 was more than likely ordered that way as an option.

Mark Walker's '68 would be a good one to compare to this eBay bass.
User avatar
wints
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6481
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2001 11:21 am

Re: 1968 4001

Post by wints »

rickaddict wrote:
wints wrote:
leftybass wrote:Interesting that it's a '68 and has Rick-O-Sound.
That was my first thought John. Earliest I have seen with ROS, and my Dec 68 is still mono. Great bass, possibly one of the Scott Jennings batch?
But this bass left the factory in the late 80's. Maybe it was completed using some current parts (wiring harness and retro-stamped jack plate).
Jeff, I tend to think that HH serial is original, and like John S posted, ordered this way. Jeff Rath's Sept 68, a month older, was mono IIRC as well.
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: 1968 4001

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

my oct. '68 is mono with a black nut. i have no neck pull at the joint on any of my three, and my '68 has a third thinner fretboard.
User avatar
simer4001
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 8:14 pm

Re: 1968 4001

Post by simer4001 »

$10,500 isn't enough for him? He has to charge $58.64 for shipping? :?
User avatar
Grey
Advanced Member
Posts: 1659
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:10 pm

Re: 1968 4001

Post by Grey »

simer4001 wrote:$10,500 isn't enough for him? He has to charge $58.64 for shipping? :?
That's relatively cheap to ship a guitar, shipping on my Ric+OHSC was hovering above 80$ including insurance.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: 1968 4001

Post by johnallg »

Spike- wrote:
simer4001 wrote:$10,500 isn't enough for him? He has to charge $58.64 for shipping? :?
That's relatively cheap to ship a guitar, shipping on my Ric+OHSC was hovering above 80$ including insurance.
Maybe, but for $10.5k you'd think he could spring for shipping. :roll:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”