So now again
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Mr. Hall, sorry, but that was not the reply I was looking for. Can you kindly confirm or comment on our observations? Your knowledge would be of great help. Thanks in advance.
"The youth of today should start thinking about the state in which they want to leave this planet to Keith Richards..."! Quote by an unknown musician
Mr. Hall, sorry, but that was not the reply I was looking for. Can you kindly confirm or comment on our observations? Your knowledge would be of great help for all forumites. Thanks in advance.
"The youth of today should start thinking about the state in which they want to leave this planet to Keith Richards..."! Quote by an unknown musician
It is normal for a 4001/3 to behave that way. The tone of the dominant pickup will rule. The pickups of a 4002 are independent. If you crank up the tone on the neck pickup all the way but back the volume down to any level below the volume of the treble pickup you can still hear the tone of the neck pickup. It is not lost as it would be on the 4001/3 with the same settings. Not that there is anything wrong with the way the 4001/3 works. It is just different from the 4002.
The grounding actually IS separated by the additional 0.0047 cap in the 4001 and ONLY THEN the tone pots work totally independent!!! Maybe this is more of the real reason behind that "bass sucker" than mimicking the double bass sound, what it never really did? However the 4001/4003 electronics ARE "weird wired". The circuit of the Gibson SG guitar and EB3 bass (two PU version) give an independent tone of each PU, but I wonder if this can be achieved with the stereo wiring of the Ricks?
"The youth of today should start thinking about the state in which they want to leave this planet to Keith Richards..."! Quote by an unknown musician
