Original Owner 360/12

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Re: Original Owner 360/12

Post by leftybass »

Very nice, Bob. Still a looker after all these years for sure.
242_foxtrot
Junior Member
Posts: 160
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 3:00 pm

Re: Original Owner 360/12

Post by 242_foxtrot »

Beautiful. I wish I still had my 67 360/12. :D
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12652
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Re: Original Owner 360/12

Post by doctorwho »

hjarnett wrote:very nice flame on that one almost like a carl wilson
+1 WOW! :shock: :D
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
chronictown
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 791
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2000 12:09 pm

Re: Original Owner 360/12

Post by chronictown »

Beautiful guitar, Bob. Good thing you protected the back - far too many older Ricks have that characteristic gigging rash through the finish, and with the lovely maple on yours that kind of damage would have been a real shame. Thanks for posting the pics!
Original360
New member
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 1:51 pm

Re: Original Owner 360/12

Post by Original360 »

chronictown wrote:Beautiful guitar, Bob. Good thing you protected the back - far too many older Ricks have that characteristic gigging rash through the finish, and with the lovely maple on yours that kind of damage would have been a real shame. Thanks for posting the pics!

I put that piece of leather on there very soon after I got the guitar. I glued it on with rubber cement. (I know.. Don't yell.) You can also see that I put a couple of pieces of white athletic tape on the bottom edge to hold the leather where it would start to curl and come off. You can also see from the wear on the leather that it has taken a quite beating. The good news is all of the adhesive stuff came off fairly easily and did not leave significant marks in the finish. I certainly would not recommend gluing anything to your guitar however.

It plays great. The neck is still perfect. I always did like the neck on this guitar. When I bought it there were two that I was looking at. I picked this one because of the neck.

Other things I did: I took the cover off the bridge. I didn't like the way it interferred with my hand. By the way, I just looked, I still have it in the case. I played it as a 12 string early and a 6 string later. This caused the nut to break out on the G string. It holds ok. But if you look closely you can see it.

Bob
User avatar
libratune
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4255
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 9:06 am
Contact:

Re: Original Owner 360/12

Post by libratune »

242_foxtrot wrote:Beautiful. I wish I still had my 67 360/12. :D
+1. My 1967 360-12 Mapleglo. Traded a Vox Mark XII boat-anchor for it (with a little cash from my friends). Lots of gigs and lots of memories . . .

Who would have thunk I would be pining away for it 40 years later?

Good for you to hold onto it. It's a great-looking guitar.
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6992
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Original Owner 360/12

Post by collin »

Welcome Robert! You will find this forum to be very helpful and entertaining.

What a great guitar, and very cool to see it in the hands of it's original owners.

Have to admit, I thought the leather thing was weird, BUT....if you look at just about any other vintage guitar (Ric or otherwise) they have belt buckle rash on the backside, or worming etc...yours looks immaculate, well done!

Cheers,
-Collin
Wurlitzer
Member
Posts: 265
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:55 pm

Re: Original Owner 360/12

Post by Wurlitzer »

do you remember what kind of strings you used back in the 60s ? round or flat wound ?
User avatar
CrestingWave
New member
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 1:42 pm

Re: Original Owner 360/12

Post by CrestingWave »

Damon Davis wrote:do you remember what kind of strings you used back in the 60s ? round or flat wound ?
I am obviously not the OP, but I can tell you that my '65 450/12 FG came from Rickenbacker fitted with flat wound strings. and the factory replacement strings "Electro Strings" in the red factory box with silver lettering, as I recall, were also flat wound, with a would primary third, or "G" string. Very nice strings, BTW.

JR
User avatar
lyric_girl
Junior Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2008 7:20 pm

Re: Original Owner 360/12

Post by lyric_girl »

Welcome Bob. What an amazing story. Definitely looking forward to pics.
'10 360 JetGlo
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: Original Owner 360/12

Post by deaconblues »

lyric_girl wrote:Welcome Bob. What an amazing story. Definitely looking forward to pics.
Page 2.
Original360
New member
Posts: 17
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 1:51 pm

Re: Original Owner 360/12

Post by Original360 »

Damon Davis wrote:do you remember what kind of strings you used back in the 60s ? round or flat wound ?
At this point I can't tell you for certain what type of string came on the guitar. My recollection is that they were probably flat wound. I did prefer round wound strings and probably switched fairly soon. Maybe '68.

Bob
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”